From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add wakeup feature for GPIO CD pin
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 13:43:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqjZdN0zv2iW+Rq6WZSo56HfyPFYHvg-JvzYZPy_eTSBQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1590481839-28603-1-git-send-email-haibo.chen@nxp.com>
+ Rafael, linux-pm
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:41, <haibo.chen@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
>
> When use the specific GPIO to detect the card insert/remove, we can
> also add the GPIO as a wakeup source. When system suspend, insert or
> remove the card can wakeup the system.
Yes, this makes perfect sense! However...
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 5398af4824c3..7af9d87d4245 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -1599,6 +1599,11 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data)) {
> host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN;
> host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR | MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR;
> +
> + /* GPIO CD can be set as a wakeup source */
> + host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE;
> + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
> +
... if the device is attached to a genpd (a PM domain), this may cause
it to stay powered on in the system suspend state. Not sure if that
can cause a problem for you? Wasting energy?
In any case, I think it's wrong to make "&pdev->dev" wakeup capable,
like this. Especially as at it's the GPIO controller that manages the
system wakeup irq.
> if (!(imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_HS200))
> host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_HS200;
>
> @@ -1734,8 +1739,15 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc);
>
> ret = sdhci_suspend_host(host);
> - if (!ret)
> - return pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
> + ret = mmc_gpio_set_cd_wake(host->mmc, true);
With the above said, I think the best available approach at this
point, is to just call mmc_gpio_set_cd_wake() - and just skip checking
device_may_wakeup().
BTW, mmc_gpio_set_cd_wake() calls enable_irq_wake(), which doesn't
require the "dev" to be wakeup capable. So this is fine!
Yes, it means that the IRQ will be configured as a system wakeup,
without letting user space to have a say about it. I guess we can live
with that limitation.
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1759,6 +1771,9 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_resume(struct device *dev)
> if (host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE)
> ret = cqhci_resume(host->mmc);
>
> + if (!ret && device_may_wakeup(dev))
> + ret = mmc_gpio_set_cd_wake(host->mmc, false);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> #endif
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Kind regards
Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 8:30 [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add wakeup feature for GPIO CD pin haibo.chen
2020-05-26 11:43 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-05-27 2:32 ` BOUGH CHEN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFqjZdN0zv2iW+Rq6WZSo56HfyPFYHvg-JvzYZPy_eTSBQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).