From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@gmail.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: make sure SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN bit sticks
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:34:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr41yuESMuoKF_KUSW4sP_cZxzjW4gKMv_0ShtoEOmS3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200219210730.27640-1-jeff.dagenais@gmail.com>
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 22:07, Jean-Francois Dagenais
<jeff.dagenais@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Regardless of the broken-cd quirk, when it silently doesn't stick,
> no clock is applied to the bus lines, yet the code continues to
> try to make CMDs and times out after 10 seconds for each. This
> process can take up to a minute as mmc_rescan_try_freq tries the
> different commands to discover the card.
>
> Short of changing sdhci_enable_clk's signature chain in all
> dependent drivers, at least provide a hint that this might be the
> problem. This will save tons of time for system integrators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@gmail.com>
The change looks reasonable to me. However I would like to get an ack
by Adrian before applying, as I may not have thought of all the
consequences this change may have.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * removed redundant wmb()
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 63db84481dff..42a02d034fda 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -1894,6 +1894,20 @@ void sdhci_enable_clk(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 clk)
>
> clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> + clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> + if (clk & SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN)
> + return;
> +
> + /* The controller will clear this bit if card absent condition is
> + * detected. If card is indeed present, check platform configuration for
> + * how CD is reported to the SDHCI host controller. There may be an
> + * "assume present" mechanism in the platform registers, or your pin mux
> + * may be incorrect.
> + */
> + pr_err("%s: SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN bit did not stick. Card absent?\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> + sdhci_dumpregs(host);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_enable_clk);
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-19 21:07 [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: make sure SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN bit sticks Jean-Francois Dagenais
2020-03-04 15:34 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-03-05 7:35 ` Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFr41yuESMuoKF_KUSW4sP_cZxzjW4gKMv_0ShtoEOmS3A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=jeff.dagenais@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).