From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFT 0/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: improve TAP selection if all TAPs are good
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:38:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB4544095698FB020DD81FD2B9D8CF0@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200306093159.6155-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Hi Wolfram-san,
Thank you for the patch!
> From: Wolfram Sang, Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 6:32 PM
<snip>
> It has been tested on a Renesas Salvator-XS board (R-Car M3-N). There
> were no regressions detected. HS400 could be tuned the same way, and
> checksumming large files still works. Note that I couldn't test the 'all
> TAPs are good' case without hacking the code. So, maybe the BSP team has
> a setup where this happens without tweaking? This is why the series is
> marked as 'RFT' still.
Fortunately, I found such an 'all TAPs are good' case board (R-Car H3).
So, I tested this patch series with update tap_cnt on patch 1/3.
And then, I didn't find any regression. So,
Tested-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 9:31 [PATCH RFT 0/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: improve TAP selection if all TAPs are good Wolfram Sang
2020-03-06 9:31 ` [PATCH RFT 1/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: refactor calculation of best TAP Wolfram Sang
2020-03-26 7:04 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-04-07 15:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-06 9:31 ` [PATCH RFT 2/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: clarify handling of selecting TAPs Wolfram Sang
2020-03-26 7:06 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-03-06 9:31 ` [PATCH RFT 3/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: improve TAP selection if all TAPs are good Wolfram Sang
2020-03-26 7:14 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-03-26 8:38 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda [this message]
2020-04-07 15:07 ` [PATCH RFT 0/3] " Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=TYAPR01MB4544095698FB020DD81FD2B9D8CF0@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
--to=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).