From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88786C33CB7 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB86D20684 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=xenosoft.de header.i=@xenosoft.de header.b="I3QUfjzn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726775AbgATJRj (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 04:17:39 -0500 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.50]:33813 "EHLO mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725872AbgATJRj (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 04:17:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1579511854; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=xenosoft.de; h=In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=qSUjC69zK2oDdbl4JMNMSrLxeZA2bP7y3B61tKmaYIY=; b=I3QUfjznxzzsyZe4E1BjVftMMCv6WiKn7GzuMWk62s8EVBWIfHLODMktFzSxlXcAbk jvj/V7Yg2monHUe8aY7rU+fZu5tER8qBOaYY2HG+Di0yUJrbl2LIiIwo7ihW2LXFL+Tm 6b4b2w5OqNO2XgrSaVivKt1ezVaMkuoksvbahaAZIHx+6Ag/tjgwlHd+PKyyn1dkFz1m Z5qfcr0Bo5g2G4RybeEuU769aQkKkyHxI5xCj9p6LL5TwChY25+pnYejG0QetTy8KCZc Ms6Om1SZgdqY6nsreNxaKpyM4U8TKsOSorlDW9mw0IIH+xnF+aggcvJgMinPZadB1SpV rGfQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":L2QefEenb+UdBJSdRCXu93KJ1bmSGnhMdmOod1DhGM4l4Hio94KKxRySd+h5FvloCR9QVidlQfU=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [192.168.178.37] by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.1.4 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id c05c1aw0K9HVw9R (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:17:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: [FSL P5020 P5040 PPC] Onboard SD card doesn't work anymore after the 'mmc-v5.4-2' updates To: Ulf Hansson Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , linuxppc-dev , Darren Stevens , mad skateman , "R.T.Dickinson" , "contact@a-eon.com" , Julian Margetson References: <20200108093903.57620-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20200108093903.57620-2-hdegoede@redhat.com> <61bc9265-ece0-eeb6-d4a1-4631138ecf29@intel.com> <8d67882d-04a8-0607-be4e-c1430b7fda21@redhat.com> <84a32714-ba08-74a0-0c76-3c36db44dd68@intel.com> <93446e09-5f12-800a-62fa-bf3ecea7273d@redhat.com> <399ac7d5-2518-799a-595e-f6b6878cf4ab@intel.com> From: Christian Zigotzky Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:17:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: de-DE Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Am 16.01.20 um 16:46 schrieb Ulf Hansson: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface >> [1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree? > No, because according to previous discussion that isn't the correct > solution and more importantly it will break other archs (if I recall > correctly). > > Looks like someone from the ppc community needs to pick up the ball. I am not sure if the ppc community have to fix this issue because your updates (mmc-v5.4-2) are responsible for this issue. If nobody wants to fix this issue then we will lost the onboard SD card support in the future. PLEASE check the 'mmc-v5.4-2' updates again. > >> Thanks, >> Christian >> >> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg56211.html > I think this discussion even suggested some viable solutions, so it > just be a matter of sending a patch :-) > >> [2] >> http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=4349&start=20#p49012 >> > Kind regards > Uffe