linux-modules.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/22] ima: remove firmware and module specific cached status info
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:56:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160207195653.GF17321@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454526390-19792-18-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 16-02-03 14:06:25, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Each time a file is read by the kernel, the file should be re-measured and
> the file signature re-appraised, based on policy.  As there is no need to
> preserve the status information, this patch replaces the firmware and
> module specific cache status with a generic one named read_file.
> 
> This change simplifies adding support for other files read by the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Petko Manolov <petkan@mip-labs.com>

> ---
>  security/integrity/iint.c             |  4 ++--
>  security/integrity/ima/ima.h          |  3 ++-
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c   |  9 ++++-----
>  security/integrity/integrity.h        | 16 ++++------------
>  5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c
> index 8f1ab37..345b759 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/iint.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/iint.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void iint_free(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint)
>  	iint->ima_file_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	iint->ima_mmap_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	iint->ima_bprm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> -	iint->ima_module_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> +	iint->ima_read_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	kmem_cache_free(iint_cache, iint);
>  }
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
>  	iint->ima_file_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	iint->ima_mmap_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	iint->ima_bprm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> -	iint->ima_module_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
> +	iint->ima_read_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  	iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 0b7134c..a5d2592 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -144,9 +144,10 @@ enum ima_hooks {
>  	FILE_CHECK = 1,
>  	MMAP_CHECK,
>  	BPRM_CHECK,
> +	POST_SETATTR,
>  	MODULE_CHECK,
>  	FIRMWARE_CHECK,
> -	POST_SETATTR
> +	MAX_CHECK
>  };
>  
>  /* LIM API function definitions */
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index cb0d0ff..6b4694a 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -74,13 +74,12 @@ enum integrity_status ima_get_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
>  		return iint->ima_mmap_status;
>  	case BPRM_CHECK:
>  		return iint->ima_bprm_status;
> -	case MODULE_CHECK:
> -		return iint->ima_module_status;
> -	case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> -		return iint->ima_firmware_status;
>  	case FILE_CHECK:
> -	default:
> +	case POST_SETATTR:
>  		return iint->ima_file_status;
> +	case MODULE_CHECK ... MAX_CHECK - 1:
> +	default:
> +		return iint->ima_read_status;
>  	}
>  }

I assume you used "case MODULE_CHECK ... MAX_CHECK - 1:" for readability?


> @@ -95,15 +94,14 @@ static void ima_set_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
>  	case BPRM_CHECK:
>  		iint->ima_bprm_status = status;
>  		break;
> -	case MODULE_CHECK:
> -		iint->ima_module_status = status;
> -		break;
> -	case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> -		iint->ima_firmware_status = status;
> -		break;
>  	case FILE_CHECK:
> -	default:
> +	case POST_SETATTR:
>  		iint->ima_file_status = status;
> +		break;
> +	case MODULE_CHECK ... MAX_CHECK - 1:
> +	default:
> +		iint->ima_read_status = status;
> +		break;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -117,15 +115,14 @@ static void ima_cache_flags(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
>  	case BPRM_CHECK:
>  		iint->flags |= (IMA_BPRM_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
>  		break;
> -	case MODULE_CHECK:
> -		iint->flags |= (IMA_MODULE_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
> -		break;
> -	case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> -		iint->flags |= (IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
> -		break;
>  	case FILE_CHECK:
> -	default:
> +	case POST_SETATTR:
>  		iint->flags |= (IMA_FILE_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
> +		break;
> +	case MODULE_CHECK ... MAX_CHECK - 1:
> +	default:
> +		iint->flags |= (IMA_READ_APPRAISED | IMA_APPRAISED);
> +		break;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index cfbe86f..7571ce8 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -300,13 +300,12 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func)
>  		return IMA_MMAP_APPRAISE;
>  	case BPRM_CHECK:
>  		return IMA_BPRM_APPRAISE;
> -	case MODULE_CHECK:
> -		return IMA_MODULE_APPRAISE;
> -	case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> -		return IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISE;
>  	case FILE_CHECK:
> -	default:
> +	case POST_SETATTR:
>  		return IMA_FILE_APPRAISE;
> +	case MODULE_CHECK ... MAX_CHECK - 1:
> +	default:
> +		return IMA_READ_APPRAISE;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> index 9a0ea4c..c7a111c 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> @@ -45,18 +45,12 @@
>  #define IMA_MMAP_APPRAISED	0x00000800
>  #define IMA_BPRM_APPRAISE	0x00001000
>  #define IMA_BPRM_APPRAISED	0x00002000
> -#define IMA_MODULE_APPRAISE	0x00004000
> -#define IMA_MODULE_APPRAISED	0x00008000
> -#define IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISE	0x00010000
> -#define IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISED	0x00020000
> -#define IMA_READ_APPRAISE	0x00040000
> -#define IMA_READ_APPRAISED	0x00080000
> +#define IMA_READ_APPRAISE	0x00004000
> +#define IMA_READ_APPRAISED	0x00008000
>  #define IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK	(IMA_FILE_APPRAISE | IMA_MMAP_APPRAISE | \
> -				 IMA_BPRM_APPRAISE | IMA_MODULE_APPRAISE | \
> -				 IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISE | IMA_READ_APPRAISE)
> +				 IMA_BPRM_APPRAISE | IMA_READ_APPRAISE)
>  #define IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK	(IMA_FILE_APPRAISED | IMA_MMAP_APPRAISED | \
> -				 IMA_BPRM_APPRAISED | IMA_MODULE_APPRAISED | \
> -				 IMA_FIRMWARE_APPRAISED | IMA_READ_APPRAISED)
> +				 IMA_BPRM_APPRAISED | IMA_READ_APPRAISED)
>  
>  enum evm_ima_xattr_type {
>  	IMA_XATTR_DIGEST = 0x01,
> @@ -111,8 +105,6 @@ struct integrity_iint_cache {
>  	enum integrity_status ima_file_status:4;
>  	enum integrity_status ima_mmap_status:4;
>  	enum integrity_status ima_bprm_status:4;
> -	enum integrity_status ima_module_status:4;
> -	enum integrity_status ima_firmware_status:4;
>  	enum integrity_status ima_read_status:4;
>  	enum integrity_status evm_status:4;
>  	struct ima_digest_data *ima_hash;
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-07 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 19:06 [PATCH v3 00/22] vfs: support for a common kernel file loader Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] ima: separate 'security.ima' reading functionality from collect Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] ima: refactor ima_policy_show() to display "ima_hooks" rules Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 19:45   ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-10 19:33   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] ima: use "ima_hooks" enum as function argument Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 19:46   ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-10 19:35   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] firmware: simplify dev_*() print messages for generic helpers Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:26   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] firmware: move completing fw into a helper Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:27   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] firmware: fold successful fw read early Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:36   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 20:26     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] vfs: define a generic function to read a file from the kernel Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:41   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] vfs: define kernel_read_file_id enumeration Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:41   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:45   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/22] ima: provide buffer hash calculation function Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/22] ima: calculate the hash of a buffer using aynchronous hash(ahash) Mimi Zohar
2016-02-10 19:58   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] ima: define a new hook to measure and appraise a file already in memory Mimi Zohar
2016-02-10 20:27   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] vfs: define kernel_read_file_from_path Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:46   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:47   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] firmware: replace call to fw_read_file_contents() with kernel version Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:56   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:51   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] security: define kernel_read_file hook Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:57   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:54   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-11 16:54   ` Casey Schaufler
2016-02-11 19:35     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] vfs: define kernel_copy_file_from_fd() Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 17:58   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:55   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 16/22] module: replace copy_module_from_fd with kernel version Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 18:04   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:56   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-05  0:19     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] ima: remove firmware and module specific cached status info Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 19:56   ` Petko Manolov [this message]
2016-02-10 20:18   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-10 23:14     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] kexec: replace call to copy_file_from_fd() with kernel version Mimi Zohar
2016-02-04 18:05   ` Kees Cook
2016-02-04 19:57   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-12 12:50   ` Dave Young
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] ima: support for kexec image and initramfs Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 20:10   ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-08 23:34     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-10 21:09   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-10 23:21     ` Mimi Zohar
     [not found]       ` <CACE9dm8OJ1cgbKszUG-pCiEMVarUFLLWi_jewVV-JEMGAJsA-g@mail.gmail.com>
2016-02-11  2:08         ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-11  8:47           ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-11 12:16             ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-12 12:53   ` Dave Young
2016-02-12 13:09     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] ima: load policy using path Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 19:59   ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-08  9:58     ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-08 10:35       ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-08 10:45         ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-08 21:12           ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-09  7:47             ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] ima: measure and appraise the IMA policy itself Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 20:01   ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-10 20:22   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-10 23:15     ` Mimi Zohar
2016-02-03 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] ima: require signed IMA policy Mimi Zohar
2016-02-07 20:02   ` Petko Manolov
2016-02-10 20:24   ` Dmitry Kasatkin
2016-02-04 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/22] vfs: support for a common kernel file loader Kees Cook
2016-02-04 23:54   ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160207195653.GF17321@localhost \
    --to=petkan@mip-labs.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).