From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>,
Shaun Ruffell <sruffell@sruffell.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] export/modpost: avoid renaming __ksymtab entries for symbol namespaces
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:24:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024102424.GL11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024093546.GB199239@google.com>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Matthias Maennich wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:22:22PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 10:31:39AM +0100, Matthias Maennich wrote:
> > > The introduction of the symbol namespace patches changed the way symbols are
> > > named in the ksymtab entries. That caused userland tools to fail (such as
> > > kmod's depmod). As depmod is used as part of the kernel build it was worth
> > > having another look whether this name change can be avoided.
> >
> > Why have this as a default feature? What about having an option to
> > disable this feature? The benefit being that without a full swing of
> > tests to avoid regressions its not clear what other issues may creep
> > up. With this as optional, those wanting the mechanism can enable it
> > and happilly find the issues for those more conservative.
>
> The strongest argument against that is, that the 'conservative' people
> would constantly break things for the more 'adventurous' ones. They
> would introduce namespace requirements by just using symbols without
> correctly adjusting the imports.
>
> Second, vmlinux and modules would have to be compiled in the same
> configuration. Otherwise they are incompatible and we would likely have
> to maintain code in the module loader to catch issues caused by that.
> In general, I think for the adoption of this feature and one of its
> purposes - making unexpected use of symbols across the tree visible
> already at review time - we should not make this an optional one.
> Enforcing the imports at module load time is optional (there is an
> option).
>
> And finally, having that code configurable for both options introduces
> quite some complexity in kernel/module.c, modpost and
> include/linux/export.h that would make the code hard to maintain and
> complex to test. Hence that would likely introduce more issues.
>
> I know the feature came with some rough edges. Sorry about that. I
> think, we got most of them worked out pretty well (big thanks to
> Masahiro and Jessica and others helping with that). Now the actual
> change to the surface exposed to userland tools is much smaller and the
> feature itself less intrusive.
This logic makes sense, the complexity over module loading is already
high and supporting yet another division would be a burden for review
and maintenace.
However I'd feel much more inclined to support such decisions when and if
we had a series of test cases to prevent possible regressions. Since
effort with testing will move forward, I'm happy with the status quo.
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 15:14 [PATCH 0/4] export/modpost: avoid renaming __ksymtab entries for symbol namespaces Matthias Maennich
2019-10-10 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] modpost: delegate updating namespaces to separate function Matthias Maennich
2019-10-11 14:24 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-11 15:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-12 3:19 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-10 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] modpost: make updating the symbol namespace explict Matthias Maennich
2019-10-11 14:24 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-11 15:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-12 3:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-10 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] symbol namespaces: revert to previous __ksymtab name scheme Matthias Maennich
2019-10-11 14:24 ` Will Deacon
2019-10-11 15:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-12 3:35 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-10 15:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] export: avoid code duplication in include/linux/export.h Matthias Maennich
2019-10-11 15:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-11 15:43 ` Matthias Maennich
2019-10-12 4:25 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-10-18 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] export/modpost: avoid renaming __ksymtab entries for symbol namespaces Matthias Maennich
2019-10-18 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] modpost: delegate updating namespaces to separate function Matthias Maennich
2019-10-18 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] modpost: make updating the symbol namespace explicit Matthias Maennich
2019-10-18 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] symbol namespaces: revert to previous __ksymtab name scheme Matthias Maennich
2019-10-18 9:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] export: avoid code duplication in include/linux/export.h Matthias Maennich
2019-10-21 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] export/modpost: avoid renaming __ksymtab entries for symbol namespaces Jessica Yu
2019-10-23 12:22 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-10-24 9:35 ` Matthias Maennich
2019-10-24 10:24 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024102424.GL11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=maennich@google.com \
--cc=sruffell@sruffell.net \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).