From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Nick Alcock" <nick.alcock@oracle.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
eugene.loh@oracle.com, kris.van.hees@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/13] kbuild: remove MODULE_LICENSE/AUTHOR/DESCRIPTION in non-modules
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 22:02:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f0a5ea7-2d48-435f-aaa0-82b6ef8cfcc5@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mt80l2py.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022, at 21:03, Nick Alcock wrote:
> On 6 Dec 2022, Geert Uytterhoeven uttered the following:
> Only MODULE_LICENSE invokes MODULE_FILE and thus ends up introducing a
> KBUILD_MODOBJS entry that triggers things going wrong iff not a module:
> so only it needs to go out (or be replaced with a variant that doesn't
> invoke MODULE_FILE, if you want to keep the license in too --
That sounds like a better alternative
> but if the thing is no longer a standalone entity at all I'm not sure
> what meaning it could possibly have).
As far as I can tell, the general trend is to make more things modules,
so there is a good chance that these come back eventually. If the
information in the MODULE_LICENSE field isn't wrong, I would just
leave it in there.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 16:31 [PATCH modules-next v10 00/13] kallsyms: reliable symbol->address lookup with /proc/kallmodsyms Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 01/13] kbuild: add modules.builtin.objs Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 02/13] kbuild: bring back tristate.conf Nick Alcock
2023-03-05 8:10 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 03/13] kbuild: add tristate checker Nick Alcock
2023-03-05 15:10 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 04/13] kbuild: fix up substitutions in makefiles to allow for " Nick Alcock
2023-03-05 15:11 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 05/13] kbuild: remove MODULE_LICENSE/AUTHOR/DESCRIPTION in non-modules Nick Alcock
2022-12-06 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-06 20:03 ` Nick Alcock
2022-12-06 21:02 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2022-12-07 5:03 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-12-07 5:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-12-07 8:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-05 8:09 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 06/13] build: add a simple iterator over modules.builtin.objs Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 07/13] kbuild: generate an address ranges map at vmlinux link time Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 08/13] kbuild: make address ranges map work with IBT Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 09/13] kallsyms: introduce sections needed to map symbols to built-in modules Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 10/13] kallsyms: optimize .kallsyms_modules* Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 11/13] kallsyms: distinguish text symbols fully using object file names Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 12/13] kallsyms: add /proc/kallmodsyms for text symbol disambiguation Nick Alcock
2022-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCH v10 13/13] perf: proof-of-concept kallmodsyms support Nick Alcock
2022-12-16 15:21 ` [PING] [PATCH modules-next v10 00/13] kallsyms: reliable symbol->address lookup with /proc/kallmodsyms Nick Alcock
2023-01-17 19:51 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-09 16:54 ` Nick Alcock
2023-02-09 23:53 ` Nick Alcock
2023-02-21 21:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-22 12:08 ` Nick Alcock
2023-02-22 22:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-07 23:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-04-10 13:08 ` Joe Lawrence
2023-04-24 19:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-25 8:27 ` Petr Mladek
2023-05-08 22:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-05-19 15:50 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-05-22 23:21 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-05-24 15:02 ` Nick Alcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f0a5ea7-2d48-435f-aaa0-82b6ef8cfcc5@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kris.van.hees@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.alcock@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).