From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A01ECAAD4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 21:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230478AbiHaViZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:38:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41374 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230148AbiHaViW (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:38:22 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10D7DD4CE for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-33da3a391d8so319759507b3.2 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:38:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=6E7G6kJMNs5Us6NEnCBcT2HO6AKiMVb4bH/0vpPA/4U=; b=kAtSEhj7BWkD6SMRdd1t39qS+hQKouRS4qaWZ/zCB6oGUrFNrc2cBDYGv9jQ+MdF0J uxQpVt2B9TyIrWXDxJ2lE/5kGqIlaGR3KL1ZUwaFBmwiXzmcYyLDuUovokIJ5gP+z9l0 0yNTpmhlKudmxd6FSbYJNy7iPqg2dLLVGTx3y1J7sDru+O7/1p0gaM3HCn5KVfOBeHdH 7y51BAxidLFb2zqNvKSOOe8d+T3vU43qoJCQXNWAECkcBOpBA8zLImxhZz3blz38Sv8b A0VOTCczeuCjB41nhG0Ij40swVSwGGlY/9vVEbUAh5KhCZEJca7FVQKBTYw0uiQMXn3I 8fkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=6E7G6kJMNs5Us6NEnCBcT2HO6AKiMVb4bH/0vpPA/4U=; b=Brgqe0aOM0T78B7AmRB2/8WRJriZZLBZp0NwwGthV1bFLIhksJLzI4Ywy2MfCbYoFM 5CLb74ZXMLelzLjhLQNU0reIKuByzXUtvfN7jLzQe7ROLzxdlVoGqUk6+LMJb7dcmL18 Q5P/ivqjAq3p2FZbQZVJPcxfgLyd0gWZVQpxbFJHv1xIkUpi37wQkq4r5dGUE8FGFUji 78zFWaj0WDvIf7KmLinLr/Y3BrKsMf3hFEnoBSii+qa7qFeeEsP7T2exaiWjfcj7kYk+ KqofxFxTrGaL9qvO7ljTvbqxJ6f8zo3bRKX6V0ctxEzvLbYhyLSf6G6fxxLDfJWZMKha CQgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1YASC3yByZb86YzY7dpf6Sc6Y4cw4ygR3/O+MnS7lvnCd456Yc vUIGMbIZZr4eyR5ZnsZjvIPvWDUxIHefn0j/A5gK2Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR71/tBRa7ErmmsvPBq7WvGBz62OVsrJ1soclQl+ncNHwGSnn/9fM5Y5i7G0A989GWlS6M/O5IwMTPKxavhJCfc= X-Received: by 2002:a81:85c3:0:b0:33d:a4d9:4599 with SMTP id v186-20020a8185c3000000b0033da4d94599mr19726685ywf.237.1661981899638; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:38:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220830214919.53220-1-surenb@google.com> <20220831084230.3ti3vitrzhzsu3fs@moria.home.lan> <20220831101948.f3etturccmp5ovkl@suse.de> <20220831190154.qdlsxfamans3ya5j@moria.home.lan> In-Reply-To: From: Suren Baghdasaryan Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:38:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Code tagging framework and applications To: Yosry Ahmed Cc: Kent Overstreet , Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Davidlohr Bueso , Matthew Wilcox , "Liam R. Howlett" , David Vernet , Juri Lelli , Laurent Dufour , Peter Xu , David Hildenbrand , Jens Axboe , mcgrof@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, changbin.du@intel.com, ytcoode@gmail.com, Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Benjamin Segall , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Valentin Schneider , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , dvyukov@google.com, Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song , arnd@arndb.de, jbaron@akamai.com, David Rientjes , Minchan Kim , Kalesh Singh , kernel-team , Linux-MM , iommu@lists.linux.dev, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:56 PM Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:02 PM Kent Overstreet > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:47:32PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 31-08-22 11:19:48, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > Whatever asking for an explanation as to why equivalent functionality > > > > cannot not be created from ftrace/kprobe/eBPF/whatever is reasonable. > > > > > > Fully agreed and this is especially true for a change this size > > > 77 files changed, 3406 insertions(+), 703 deletions(-) > > > > In the case of memory allocation accounting, you flat cannot do this with ftrace > > - you could maybe do a janky version that isn't fully accurate, much slower, > > more complicated for the developer to understand and debug and more complicated > > for the end user. > > > > But please, I invite anyone who's actually been doing this with ftrace to > > demonstrate otherwise. > > > > Ftrace just isn't the right tool for the job here - we're talking about adding > > per callsite accounting to some of the fastest fast paths in the kernel. > > > > And the size of the changes for memory allocation accounting are much more > > reasonable: > > 33 files changed, 623 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > > > > The code tagging library should exist anyways, it's been open coded half a dozen > > times in the kernel already. > > > > And once we've got that, the time stats code is _also_ far simpler than doing it > > with ftrace would be. If anyone here has successfully debugged latency issues > > with ftrace, I'd really like to hear it. Again, for debugging latency issues you > > want something that can always be on, and that's not cheap with ftrace - and > > never mind the hassle of correlating start and end wait trace events, builting > > up histograms, etc. - that's all handled here. > > > > Cheap, simple, easy to use. What more could you want? > > > > This is very interesting work! Do you have any data about the overhead > this introduces, especially in a production environment? I am > especially interested in memory allocations tracking and detecting > leaks. I had the numbers for my previous implementation, before we started using the lazy percpu counters but that would not apply to the new implementation. I'll rerun the measurements and will post the exact numbers in a day or so. > (Sorry if you already posted this kind of data somewhere that I missed)