From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Cc: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
david@redhat.com, mwilck@suse.com, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Don't wait for GOING modules
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 16:18:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8c652Dlbc9yarFx@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8c3hgVwKiVrKJM1@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:04:22PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> ./tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh -t 0006
> Tue Jan 17 23:18:13 UTC 2023
> Running test: kmod_test_0006 - run #0
> kmod_test_0006: OK! - loading kmod test
> kmod_test_0006: FAIL, test expects SUCCESS (0) - got -EINVAL (-22)
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Custom trigger configuration for: test_kmod0
> Number of threads: 50
> Test_case: TEST_KMOD_FS_TYPE (2)
> driver: test_module
> fs: xfs
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Test completed
>
> When can multiple get_fs_type() calls be issued on a system? When
> mounting a large number of filesystems. Sadly though this issue seems
> to have gone unnoticed for a while now. Even reverting commit
> 6e6de3dee51a doesn't fix it, and I've run into issues with trying
> to bisect, first due to missing Kees' patch which fixes a compiler
> failure on older kernel [0] and now I'm seeing this while trying to
> build v5.1:
>
> ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/pgtable_64.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `__force_order';
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr_64.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
> ld: warning: arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi_thunk_64.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack
> ld: NOTE: This behaviour is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of the linker
> ld: arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.head.text'
> ld: warning: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions
> ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE
> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:118: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86/boot/Makefile:112: arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/x86/Makefile:283: bzImage] Error 2
>
> [0] http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220213182443.4037039-1-keescook@chromium.org
>
> But we should try to bisect to see what cauased the above kmod test 0006
> to start failing.
BTW if someone beats me to bisecting the above it would be appreciated.
I have a feeling having old gcc / linker, etc would be easier.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 10:35 [PATCH v2] module: Don't wait for GOING modules Petr Pavlu
2022-12-05 19:54 ` Petr Mladek
2022-12-06 16:57 ` Petr Pavlu
2022-12-07 15:15 ` Petr Mladek
2022-12-08 2:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-12-12 11:29 ` Petr Pavlu
2022-12-13 2:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-12-13 5:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-12-13 10:17 ` Petr Mladek
2022-12-13 13:36 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-01-18 0:04 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-18 0:18 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2023-01-18 15:12 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-01-18 18:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-19 12:26 ` Petr Pavlu
2023-01-19 15:47 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-20 0:51 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-20 0:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-21 22:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-11 21:36 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-12 6:25 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-22 22:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-23 15:01 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-23 15:08 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-24 6:03 ` Lucas De Marchi
2023-03-24 18:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-24 19:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-18 20:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-19 1:23 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-19 23:37 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-19 1:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8c652Dlbc9yarFx@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).