From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] tty: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:24:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDhk79Ep0IrXxtL6@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZB3mw4G8GdGwSP41@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 11:06:59AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 03:29:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 02:16:03PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
> > > On 24 Mar 2023, Geert Uytterhoeven uttered the following:
> > > > I (still) agree with that, and I saw similar comments from others as well.
> > > > Unfortunately these comments are spread across tens of threads :-(
> > >
> > > Ugh. Should I do this sort of thing in one big commit next time? That
> > > would fix that problem, but at the cost of others. Lumping seems to me
> > > to be troublesome because it makes it harder to accept/reject different
> > > bits, but would it be *as* troublesome as this much splitting?
> >
> > The problem is, some of us disagree that this should be done at all, so
> > reverting all of the individual parts is going to be hard now.
> >
> > Please put back the license bits that you removed, as it is not a good
> > idea to remove that if the file does not have a SPDX entry at the very
> > least.
>
> Nick, I've just dropped your series. Please only re-submit only for
> files where the license is clear. The effort of clarifying licenses
> on files where one doesn't have an SPDX tag is welcomed but can take
> time and we'll need this anyway in the future to help later strive to
> see if we can automatically generate the MODULE_LICENSE() from the
> SPDX tags.
I had not seen any effort to get a new series going for this so given
I realize this is a royal pain in the ass to, and Nick has *already*
done enough, I've done the sanity checks myself and dropped the patches
from Nick which lacked SPDX annotations.
One can verify if a patch you are modifying lacks SPDX annotations in
a commit series with:
./scripts/spdxcheck.py -f $(git diff --name-only commid-id | xargs echo)
And so I've dropped all the patches that did that from Nick's series
and pushed to modules-next only the ones that did have an SPDX
annotation.
There were only 11 files which *did not* have SPDX annoations, these can
be worked on with the community later to get SPDX annotations added:
drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-pic.c
drivers/reset/reset-axs10x.c
drivers/reset/reset-hsdk.c
drivers/video/fbdev/asiliantfb.c
drivers/video/fbdev/gbefb.c
drivers/video/fbdev/imsttfb.c
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
lib/glob.c
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 21:17 [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 01/17] irqchip: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 02/17] bus: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 03/17] braille_console: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 04/17] arm-cci: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 05/17] drivers: bus: simple-pm-bus: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-03 7:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-03-03 18:32 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-03 18:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-03-20 10:58 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 06/17] watch_queue: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 07/17] btree: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 08/17] lib: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 09/17] fprobe: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 10/17] tty: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-09 16:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-09 22:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-10 7:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-10 19:33 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-24 9:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-03-24 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-03-24 9:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-24 9:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-03-24 14:16 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-24 14:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-24 18:06 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-27 10:46 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-27 11:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-27 14:54 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-27 18:23 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-29 2:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-04-13 20:24 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2023-03-26 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 11/17] unicode: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-06 15:32 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 12/17] udmabuf: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 13/17] regulator: stm32-pwr: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-03 0:31 ` Mark Brown
2023-03-03 18:30 ` Nick Alcock
2023-03-04 20:12 ` Mark Brown
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 15/17] xen: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-06 7:45 ` Juergen Gross
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 16/17] zpool: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-02 21:17 ` [PATCH 17/17] zswap: " Nick Alcock
2023-03-03 22:22 ` [PATCH 00/17] MODULE_LICENSE removals, sixth tranche Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-20 11:00 ` Nick Alcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDhk79Ep0IrXxtL6@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.alcock@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).