linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Prefer asynchronous probe
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:04:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160145480408.16293.4165746233350450081.b4-ty@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200902160002.1.I658d1c0db9adfeb9a59bc55e96a19e192c959e55@changeid>

On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:00:40 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> On my system the spi_nor_probe() took ~6 ms at bootup.  That's not a
> lot, but every little bit adds up to a slow bootup.  While we can get
> this out of the boot path by making it a module, there are times where
> it is convenient (or even required) for this to be builtin the kernel.
> Let's set that we prefer async probe so that we don't block other
> drivers from probing while we are probing.
> 
> [...]

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git spi-nor/next, thanks!
[1/1] mtd: spi-nor: Prefer asynchronous probe
      https://git.kernel.org/mtd/c/03edda0e1e

--
Regards
Vignesh


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-02 23:00 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Prefer asynchronous probe Douglas Anderson
2020-09-30  8:34 ` Vignesh Raghavendra [this message]
2020-10-03 15:06 ` Michael Walle
2020-10-03 16:27   ` Doug Anderson
2020-10-03 16:54     ` Michael Walle
2020-10-03 17:00       ` Doug Anderson
2020-10-04 14:10         ` Michael Walle
2020-10-05 14:53           ` Doug Anderson
2020-10-05  9:06       ` Vignesh Raghavendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160145480408.16293.4165746233350450081.b4-ty@ti.com \
    --to=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).