Linux-mtd Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:53:57 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1642440141.89874.1560365637583.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612152120.GA17450@kroah.com>

Greg,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>, "Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind1@gmail.com>, "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2019 17:21:20
> Betreff: [PATCH] ubifs: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.

why is it bad if we handle errors from debugfs?
At least a nice log message a la "sorry, no ubifs debuging for you"
would be nice to have.

Thanks,
//richard

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-12 15:21 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-12 16:52 ` Mario Rugiero
2019-06-12 17:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-12 18:53 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2019-06-13  5:47   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1642440141.89874.1560365637583.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-mtd Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/0 linux-mtd/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-mtd linux-mtd/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd \
		linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org linux-mtd@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-mtd


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox