From: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, somlo@cmu.edu,
mst@redhat.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org,
hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, huangjianan@oppo.com,
mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
richard@nod.at, liushixin2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kset: fix memory leak when kset_register() returns error
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:06:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176ae1a1-9240-eef8-04e9-000d47646f4a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221024121910.1169801-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
On 2022-10-24 08:19, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Inject fault while loading module, kset_register() may fail.
> If it fails, the name allocated by kobject_set_name() which
> is called before kset_register() is leaked, because refcount
> of kobject is hold in kset_init().
"is hold" --> "was set".
Also, I'd say "which must be called" instead of "is", since
we cannot register kobj/kset without a name--the kobj code crashes,
and we want to make this clear. IOW, a novice user may wonder
where "is" it called, as opposed to learning that they "must"
call it to allocate/set a name, before calling kset_register().
So, I'd say this:
"If it fails, the name allocated by kobject_set_name() which must
be called before a call to kset_regsiter() is leaked, since
refcount of kobj was set in kset_init()."
>
> As a kset may be embedded in a larger structure which needs
> be freed in release() function or error path in callers, we
Drop "As", start with "A kset". "which needs _to_ be".
Also please specify that the release is part of the ktype,
like this:
"A kset may be embedded in a larger structure which needs to be
freed in ktype.release() or error path in callers, we ..."
> can not call kset_put() in kset_register(), or it will cause
> double free, so just call kfree_const() to free the name and
> set it to NULL.
>
> With this fix, the callers don't need to care about the name
> freeing and call an extra kset_put() if kset_register() fails.
This is unclear because you're *missing* a verb:
"and call an extra kset_put()".
Please add the proper verb _between_ "and call", something like,
"With this fix, the callers don't need to care about freeing
the name of the kset, and _can_ call kset_put() if kset_register() fails."
Choose a proper verb here: can, should, cannot, should not, etc.
We can do this because you set "kset.kobj.name to NULL, and this
is checked for in kobject_cleanup(). We just need to stipulate
whether they should/shouldn't have to call kset_put(), or can free the kset
and/or the embedding object themselves. This really depends
on how we want kset_register() to behave in the future, and on
user's own ktype.release implementation...
>
> Suggested-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> Free name inside of kset_register() instead of calling kset_put()
> in drivers.
> ---
> lib/kobject.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
> index a0b2dbfcfa23..3409a89c81e5 100644
> --- a/lib/kobject.c
> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
> @@ -834,6 +834,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kobj_sysfs_ops);
> /**
> * kset_register() - Initialize and add a kset.
> * @k: kset.
> + *
> + * NOTE: On error, the kset.kobj.name allocated by() kobj_set_name()
> + * which is called before kset_register() in caller need be freed.
> */
> int kset_register(struct kset *k)
> {
> @@ -844,8 +847,11 @@ int kset_register(struct kset *k)
>
> kset_init(k);
> err = kobject_add_internal(&k->kobj);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> + kfree_const(k->kobj.name);
> + k->kobj.name = NULL;
> return err;
> + }
This looks good. It's good you set kset.kobj.name to NULL, so that
recovery/free paths don't get confused. Waiting for v3.
(I guess this is no different than what we currently do in kobject_cleanup(),
so I see it as safe, no-surprises implementation.)
Regards,
Luben
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 12:19 [PATCH v2] kset: fix memory leak when kset_register() returns error Yang Yingliang
2022-10-24 13:52 ` Greg KH
2022-10-24 14:39 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-10-24 14:53 ` Greg KH
2022-10-24 15:10 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-10-24 21:06 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2022-10-24 21:25 ` Luben Tuikov
2022-10-25 2:16 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-10-25 2:53 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176ae1a1-9240-eef8-04e9-000d47646f4a@amd.com \
--to=luben.tuikov@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=huangjianan@oppo.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liushixin2@huawei.com \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=somlo@cmu.edu \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).