linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: atmel nand bindings vs. actual dts files
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:07:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1823900.qPX5mxbl1h@ada> (raw)

Hei hei,

I'm currently adapting the at91-sama5d27_som1_ek.dts file for a custom 
modification of that board [1], and had a look at how sama5d3.dtsi, 
sama5d4.dtsi and boards including those define the nand controller and the 
nand chip. What puzzles me is the following. The atmel-nand devicetree binding 
docs say:


Required properties:
- reg: describes the CS lines assigned to the NAND device. If the NAND device
       exposes multiple CS lines (multi-dies chips), your reg property will
       contain X tuples of 3 entries.
       1st entry: the CS line this NAND chip is connected to
       2nd entry: the base offset of the memory region assigned to this
                  device (always 0)
       3rd entry: the memory region size (always 0x800000)


However the actual node of e.g. at91-sama5d3_xplained.dts contains this:

                                nand@3 {
                                        reg = <0x3 0x0 0x2>;
                                        atmel,rb = <0>;
                                        nand-bus-width = <8>;
                                        nand-ecc-mode = "hw";
                                        nand-ecc-strength = <4>;
                                        nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
                                        nand-on-flash-bbt;

So instead of "always 0x800000" that node has 0x2 as third entry for the 'reg' 
property. Why is that?

Bonus question: if the R/B line is not connected, how is that expressed in 
dts? As far as I understood that is possible, if the driver polls some status 
register instead of that line level, right?

Greets
Alex

[1] we piggyback soldered a raw NAND flash to the som1 module with some 	
enameled copper wire for evaluation, NAND is already responding in a modified 
U-Boot ;-)

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-06 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-06 14:07 Alexander Dahl [this message]
2019-03-07 16:25 ` atmel nand bindings vs. actual dts files Alexander Dahl
2019-04-29  9:55   ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-30  9:24     ` Alexander Dahl
2019-04-30  9:32       ` Miquel Raynal
2019-06-04  1:53         ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-06-04  7:43           ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1823900.qPX5mxbl1h@ada \
    --to=ada@thorsis.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).