* [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
@ 2019-01-28 18:15 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-05 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-01-28 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kyungmin Park, Boris Brezillon, Miquel Raynal,
Richard Weinberger, David Woodhouse, Brian Norris, Marek Vasut,
Wan ZongShun
Cc: Kees Cook, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3264:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3288:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5538:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5557:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5595:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:332:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:483:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c:2254:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:512:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:517:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:466:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:471:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c: In function ‘nuc900_nand_command_lp’:
./arch/x86/include/asm/io.h:91:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
#define __raw_writel __writel
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:52:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
__raw_writel((val), (dev)->reg + REG_SMCMD)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:196:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_cmd_reg’
write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:197:2: note: here
default:
^~~~~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add extra /* fall through */ comment in nandsim.c file.
drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c | 2 ++
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c | 1 +
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c | 3 ++-
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c | 3 ++-
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c | 4 ++++
7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
index 4ca4b194e7d7..e9b71ad24f50 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
@@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
}
+ /* fall through */
case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
/* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
+ /* fall through */
case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb:
/* A-Die has all block unlock */
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
index 53f57e0f007e..ead54c90f2d1 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
@@ -1477,6 +1477,7 @@ static int __init doc_probe(unsigned long physadr)
break;
case DOC_ChipID_DocMilPlus32:
pr_err("DiskOnChip Millennium Plus 32MB is not supported, ignoring.\n");
+ /* fall through */
default:
ret = -ENODEV;
goto notfound;
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 96cadead262e..e05ecf2e4269 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -5537,6 +5537,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
}
if (!ecc->read_page)
ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
+ /* fall through */
case NAND_ECC_HW:
/* Use standard hwecc read page function? */
@@ -5556,6 +5557,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
if (!ecc->write_subpage && ecc->hwctl && ecc->calculate)
ecc->write_subpage = nand_write_subpage_hwecc;
+ /* fall through */
case NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME:
if ((!ecc->calculate || !ecc->correct || !ecc->hwctl) &&
@@ -5593,6 +5595,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
ecc->size, mtd->writesize);
ecc->mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
ecc->algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
+ /* fall through */
case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
ret = nand_set_ecc_soft_ops(chip);
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
index 43575943f13b..f2526ec616a6 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
@@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static void nand_command(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
*/
if (column == -1 && page_addr == -1)
return;
+ /* fall through */
default:
/*
@@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ static void nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
chip->legacy.cmd_ctrl(chip, NAND_CMD_NONE,
NAND_NCE | NAND_CTRL_CHANGE);
- /* This applies to read commands */
+ /* fall through - This applies to read commands */
default:
/*
* If we don't have access to the busy pin, we apply the given
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
index 933d1a629c51..edf5fd3d5f07 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
@@ -2251,9 +2251,11 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
switch (bbt) {
case 2:
- chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
+ chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
+ /* fall through */
case 1:
- chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
+ chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
+ /* fall through */
case 0:
break;
default:
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
index 38b1994e7ed3..56fa84029482 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
@@ -192,8 +192,9 @@ static void nuc900_nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip,
return;
case NAND_CMD_READ0:
-
write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
+ /* fall through */
+
default:
if (!chip->legacy.dev_ready) {
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
index a3f32f939cc1..94c6401ef32f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
@@ -465,11 +465,13 @@ static int elm_context_save(struct elm_info *info)
ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_5 + offset);
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset);
+ /* fall through */
case BCH8_ECC:
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset);
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset);
+ /* fall through */
case BCH4_ECC:
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset);
@@ -511,11 +513,13 @@ static int elm_context_restore(struct elm_info *info)
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_5[i]);
elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset,
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i]);
+ /* fall through */
case BCH8_ECC:
elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset,
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i]);
elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset,
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i]);
+ /* fall through */
case BCH4_ECC:
elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset,
regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i]);
--
2.20.1
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2019-01-28 18:15 [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-02-05 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-08 17:11 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-11 18:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2019-02-05 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Kees Cook, Wan ZongShun, Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger,
linux-kernel, Marek Vasut, Kyungmin Park, linux-mtd,
Brian Norris, David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Gustavo,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Mon, 28 Jan
2019 12:15:20 -0600:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3264:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3288:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5538:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5557:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5595:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:332:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:483:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c:2254:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:512:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:517:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:466:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:471:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c: In function ‘nuc900_nand_command_lp’:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io.h:91:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> #define __raw_writel __writel
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:52:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
> __raw_writel((val), (dev)->reg + REG_SMCMD)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:196:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_cmd_reg’
> write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:197:2: note: here
> default:
> ^~~~~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add extra /* fall through */ comment in nandsim.c file.
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c | 2 ++
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c | 1 +
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c | 4 ++++
> 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
> index 4ca4b194e7d7..e9b71ad24f50 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
onenand changes should probably be in a separate patch prefixed
mtd: onenand:
When you are unsure, please run
git log --oneline --follow drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/
> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
> }
> + /* fall through */
>
> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
> + /* fall through */
This looks strange.
In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
if process is evaluated to true.
Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
- it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
- it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
missing fall through or a bug.
>
> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb:
> /* A-Die has all block unlock */
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
> index 53f57e0f007e..ead54c90f2d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,7 @@ static int __init doc_probe(unsigned long physadr)
> break;
> case DOC_ChipID_DocMilPlus32:
> pr_err("DiskOnChip Millennium Plus 32MB is not supported, ignoring.\n");
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto notfound;
This is fine.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 96cadead262e..e05ecf2e4269 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -5537,6 +5537,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> }
> if (!ecc->read_page)
> ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
> + /* fall through */
>
> case NAND_ECC_HW:
> /* Use standard hwecc read page function? */
> @@ -5556,6 +5557,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
> if (!ecc->write_subpage && ecc->hwctl && ecc->calculate)
> ecc->write_subpage = nand_write_subpage_hwecc;
> + /* fall through */
>
> case NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME:
> if ((!ecc->calculate || !ecc->correct || !ecc->hwctl) &&
> @@ -5593,6 +5595,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
> ecc->size, mtd->writesize);
> ecc->mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
> ecc->algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> + /* fall through */
>
> case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
> ret = nand_set_ecc_soft_ops(chip);
These three already are in nand/next.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
> index 43575943f13b..f2526ec616a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static void nand_command(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
> */
> if (column == -1 && page_addr == -1)
> return;
> + /* fall through */
>
> default:
> /*
> @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ static void nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
> chip->legacy.cmd_ctrl(chip, NAND_CMD_NONE,
> NAND_NCE | NAND_CTRL_CHANGE);
>
> - /* This applies to read commands */
> + /* fall through - This applies to read commands */
> default:
> /*
> * If we don't have access to the busy pin, we apply the given
Already fixed in nand/next too.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
> index 933d1a629c51..edf5fd3d5f07 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
> @@ -2251,9 +2251,11 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
>
> switch (bbt) {
> case 2:
> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
> + /* fall through */
> case 1:
> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
> + /* fall through */
> case 0:
> break;
> default:
This is fine.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
> index 38b1994e7ed3..56fa84029482 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
> @@ -192,8 +192,9 @@ static void nuc900_nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip,
> return;
>
> case NAND_CMD_READ0:
> -
> write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
> + /* fall through */
> +
> default:
>
> if (!chip->legacy.dev_ready) {
This is fine too.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
> index a3f32f939cc1..94c6401ef32f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
> @@ -465,11 +465,13 @@ static int elm_context_save(struct elm_info *info)
> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_5 + offset);
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset);
> + /* fall through */
> case BCH8_ECC:
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset);
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset);
> + /* fall through */
> case BCH4_ECC:
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset);
> @@ -511,11 +513,13 @@ static int elm_context_restore(struct elm_info *info)
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_5[i]);
> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset,
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i]);
> + /* fall through */
> case BCH8_ECC:
> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset,
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i]);
> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset,
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i]);
> + /* fall through */
> case BCH4_ECC:
> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset,
> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i]);
And this is ok as well.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2019-02-05 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2019-02-08 17:11 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-11 18:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-02-08 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal
Cc: Kees Cook, Wan ZongShun, Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger,
linux-kernel, Marek Vasut, Kyungmin Park, linux-mtd,
Brian Norris, David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel
Hey Miquel,
On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Mon, 28 Jan
> 2019 12:15:20 -0600:
>
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3264:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c:3288:17: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5538:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5557:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5595:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:332:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c:483:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c:2254:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:512:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:517:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:466:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c:471:37: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c: In function ‘nuc900_nand_command_lp’:
>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io.h:91:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>> #define __raw_writel __writel
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:52:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’
>> __raw_writel((val), (dev)->reg + REG_SMCMD)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:196:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_cmd_reg’
>> write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c:197:2: note: here
>> default:
>> ^~~~~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Add extra /* fall through */ comment in nandsim.c file.
>>
>> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c | 1 +
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 3 +++
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c | 6 ++++--
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c | 4 ++++
>> 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
>> index 4ca4b194e7d7..e9b71ad24f50 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
>
> onenand changes should probably be in a separate patch prefixed
>
> mtd: onenand:
>
> When you are unsure, please run
>
> git log --oneline --follow drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/
>
OK. Got it.
>> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
>> }
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
>> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
>> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
>> + /* fall through */
>
> This looks strange.
>
> In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
>
> But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
> if process is evaluated to true.
>
> Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
> - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
>
> Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
> missing fall through or a bug.
>
OK. Then, I should probably skip this file for now.
>>
>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb:
>> /* A-Die has all block unlock */
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
>> index 53f57e0f007e..ead54c90f2d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/diskonchip.c
>> @@ -1477,6 +1477,7 @@ static int __init doc_probe(unsigned long physadr)
>> break;
>> case DOC_ChipID_DocMilPlus32:
>> pr_err("DiskOnChip Millennium Plus 32MB is not supported, ignoring.\n");
>> + /* fall through */
>> default:
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> goto notfound;
>
> This is fine.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>> index 96cadead262e..e05ecf2e4269 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
>> @@ -5537,6 +5537,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> }
>> if (!ecc->read_page)
>> ecc->read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_HW:
>> /* Use standard hwecc read page function? */
>> @@ -5556,6 +5557,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> ecc->read_subpage = nand_read_subpage;
>> if (!ecc->write_subpage && ecc->hwctl && ecc->calculate)
>> ecc->write_subpage = nand_write_subpage_hwecc;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME:
>> if ((!ecc->calculate || !ecc->correct || !ecc->hwctl) &&
>> @@ -5593,6 +5595,7 @@ static int nand_scan_tail(struct nand_chip *chip)
>> ecc->size, mtd->writesize);
>> ecc->mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
>> ecc->algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
>> ret = nand_set_ecc_soft_ops(chip);
>
> These three already are in nand/next.
>
Great.
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
>> index 43575943f13b..f2526ec616a6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_legacy.c
>> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static void nand_command(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
>> */
>> if (column == -1 && page_addr == -1)
>> return;
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> default:
>> /*
>> @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ static void nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int command,
>> chip->legacy.cmd_ctrl(chip, NAND_CMD_NONE,
>> NAND_NCE | NAND_CTRL_CHANGE);
>>
>> - /* This applies to read commands */
>> + /* fall through - This applies to read commands */
>> default:
>> /*
>> * If we don't have access to the busy pin, we apply the given
>
> Already fixed in nand/next too.
>
OK. Great.
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>> index 933d1a629c51..edf5fd3d5f07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nandsim.c
>> @@ -2251,9 +2251,11 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
>>
>> switch (bbt) {
>> case 2:
>> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
>> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_NO_OOB;
>> + /* fall through */
>> case 1:
>> - chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
>> + chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
>> + /* fall through */
>> case 0:
>> break;
>> default:
>
> This is fine.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
>> index 38b1994e7ed3..56fa84029482 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nuc900_nand.c
>> @@ -192,8 +192,9 @@ static void nuc900_nand_command_lp(struct nand_chip *chip,
>> return;
>>
>> case NAND_CMD_READ0:
>> -
>> write_cmd_reg(nand, NAND_CMD_READSTART);
>> + /* fall through */
>> +
>> default:
>>
>> if (!chip->legacy.dev_ready) {
>
> This is fine too.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
>> index a3f32f939cc1..94c6401ef32f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_elm.c
>> @@ -465,11 +465,13 @@ static int elm_context_save(struct elm_info *info)
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_5 + offset);
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH8_ECC:
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset);
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH4_ECC:
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i] = elm_read_reg(info,
>> ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset);
>> @@ -511,11 +513,13 @@ static int elm_context_restore(struct elm_info *info)
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_5[i]);
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_4 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_4[i]);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH8_ECC:
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_3 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_3[i]);
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_2 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_2[i]);
>> + /* fall through */
>> case BCH4_ECC:
>> elm_write_reg(info, ELM_SYNDROME_FRAGMENT_1 + offset,
>> regs->elm_syndrome_fragment_1[i]);
>
> And this is ok as well.
>
I'll leave out the files that have already been addressed and send v3 shortly.
I appreciate your feedback.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2019-02-05 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-08 17:11 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-04-11 18:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-11 22:10 ` Miquel Raynal
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-04-11 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal
Cc: Kees Cook, Wan ZongShun, Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger,
linux-kernel, Marek Vasut, Kyungmin Park, linux-mtd,
Brian Norris, David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Miquel,
On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
[..]
>> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
>> }
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
>> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
>> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
>> + /* fall through */
>
> This looks strange.
>
> In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
>
> But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
> if process is evaluated to true.
>
> Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
> - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
>
> Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
> missing fall through or a bug.
>
I wonder if you had the chance to take a look into this piece of code.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2019-04-11 18:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-04-11 22:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-11 22:20 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2019-04-11 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Kees Cook, Wan ZongShun, Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger,
linux-kernel, Marek Vasut, Kyungmin Park, linux-mtd,
Brian Norris, David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Gustavo,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Thu, 11 Apr
2019 13:30:31 -0500:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> [..]
> >> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> >> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
> >> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
> >> }
> >> + /* fall through */
> >>
> >> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> >> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
> >> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
> >> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
> >> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
> >> + /* fall through */
> >
> > This looks strange.
> >
> > In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> > ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
> >
> > But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
> > if process is evaluated to true.
> >
> > Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
> > - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> > - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> >
> > Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
> > missing fall through or a bug.
> >
>
> I wonder if you had the chance to take a look into this piece of code.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
What do you mean?
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2019-04-11 22:10 ` Miquel Raynal
@ 2019-04-11 22:20 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-12 7:24 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2019-04-11 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal
Cc: Kees Cook, Wan ZongShun, Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger,
linux-kernel, Marek Vasut, Kyungmin Park, linux-mtd,
Brian Norris, David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel
On 4/11/19 5:10 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Thu, 11 Apr
> 2019 13:30:31 -0500:
>
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> [..]
>>>> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>>>> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
>>>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
>>>> }
>>>> + /* fall through */
>>>>
>>>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
>>>> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
>>>> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
>>>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
>>>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
>>>> + /* fall through */
>>>
>>> This looks strange.
>>>
>>> In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
>>> ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
>>>
>>> But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
>>> if process is evaluated to true.
>>>
>>> Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
>>> - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
>>> - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
>>>
>>> Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
>>> missing fall through or a bug.
>>>
>>
>> I wonder if you had the chance to take a look into this piece of code.
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Gustavo
>
> What do you mean?
>
You commented that the piece of code above should be reworked. So, it wasn't
clear to me who was going to do that; and that's why I'm asking if you took
a look into it and finally determine whether we are dealing with an actual
bug or a false positive.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2019-04-11 22:20 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2019-04-12 7:24 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2019-04-12 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Kees Cook, Wan ZongShun, Boris Brezillon, Richard Weinberger,
linux-kernel, Marek Vasut, Kyungmin Park, linux-mtd,
Brian Norris, David Woodhouse, linux-arm-kernel
Hi Gustavo,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Thu, 11 Apr
2019 17:20:31 -0500:
> On 4/11/19 5:10 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Thu, 11 Apr
> > 2019 13:30:31 -0500:
> >
> >> Hi Miquel,
> >>
> >> On 2/5/19 6:55 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >> [..]
> >>>> @@ -3280,12 +3280,14 @@ static void onenand_check_features(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> >>>> if ((this->version_id & 0xf) == 0xe)
> >>>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_NOP_1;
> >>>> }
> >>>> + /* fall through */
> >>>>
> >>>> case ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> >>>> /* 2Gb DDP does not have 2 plane */
> >>>> if (!ONENAND_IS_DDP(this))
> >>>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE;
> >>>> this->options |= ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL;
> >>>> + /* fall through */
> >>>
> >>> This looks strange.
> >>>
> >>> In ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb:
> >>> ONENAND_HAS_UNLOCK_ALL is set unconditionally.
> >>>
> >>> But then, under ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_1Gb, the same option is set only
> >>> if process is evaluated to true.
> >>>
> >>> Same problem with ONENAND_HAS_2PLANE:
> >>> - it is set in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_4Gb only if ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> >>> - it is unset in ONENAND_DEVICE_DENSITY_2Gb only if !ONENAND_IS_DDP()
> >>>
> >>> Maybe this portion should be reworked because I am unsure if this is a
> >>> missing fall through or a bug.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I wonder if you had the chance to take a look into this piece of code.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> --
> >> Gustavo
> >
> > What do you mean?
> >
>
> You commented that the piece of code above should be reworked. So, it wasn't
> clear to me who was going to do that; and that's why I'm asking if you took
> a look into it and finally determine whether we are dealing with an actual
> bug or a false positive.
Yes please do it, I don't have the time and I don't plan to do it
myself.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-12 7:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-28 18:15 [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-05 12:55 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-02-08 17:11 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-11 18:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-11 22:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-11 22:20 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-04-12 7:24 ` Miquel Raynal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).