From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B55DC282DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F95218EA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="PieOKTJr"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="2JQf30n2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D7F95218EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=d6UNRJSog+xQ5AKfbDQnhbhElyNSL9yc5SJgUuuCyY0=; b=PieOKTJriX51xYEhD7Ca3yRNZy 9U+g2o/8uLldaEIq2JptSfYN/ZGhTf0sBk4P69gb3zn7K+mkseA0DsPmJ5FS0kLkFxpUVFLmiCljx flnZDnZaR1bfvF0NjpIyqd6IK8UfFprdCv0dvbFMclUVUgMFNvMD4YUyA6O99pnZ+J51hf1xZNVPZ 7H59i2y6r8lAiPfk++NHNkUo5jqCvrlV38VrYgY1LaUCWBrIV/qwGZyDaluqQJmyE+t70SMjOF6Hs j6QNIkB1bgovojQSfM1oFyNZ5Ajy0rCKQEKBrlkJaonfyHAABVJnmcqR5Bxpci3AWNY/Tb4vIyiKT 3l+PdEQQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hHQ9R-0007lU-Ge; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:49:45 +0000 Received: from conuserg-08.nifty.com ([210.131.2.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hHQ8W-0006Yy-43; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:48:51 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-08.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3J9mDiM012304; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:48:15 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-08.nifty.com x3J9mDiM012304 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555667296; bh=xEQiTaRJoMiIIoSSR5uW02FG6OV+z3ajZxuyDMzswK8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=2JQf30n281jQB4d2J0PFa1uofVewZCgz9BKrQlNEnXrgFMBLbR2Zq1r6w+iBaLG45 t3nsjO2yy9K2rayA6kAG7W5QOZXT/QC/pn2nbYfF3OTOTfF8RmCuBd5yJ5z4STfAVR S50CNHJXKGoZKrDOh8HkCZk629LOHn6U1lbZhC7JMhAyR3/Tr/rg3GcrCj9JDWjHAO UiGSppMnUWU7gB7Bziv+abekGW5t79hjFO9/SOc6KfN1rVoLYaqIJni87B3Xd6Wk7W H2/rg3c+1nge1l4Y9lbsm/7RvW65UIRkVG9T0d8qJA6UMAluoWZAQ17RYMK74wx8Rp ffTOmV/uhafAw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: prevent tracing IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:47:44 +0900 Message-Id: <20190419094754.24667-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190419094754.24667-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190419_024848_509807_B7C1C520 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christophe Leroy , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Arnd Bergmann When function tracing for IPIs is enabled, we get a warning for an overflow of the ipi_types array with the IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE type as triggered by raise_nmi(): arch/arm/kernel/smp.c: In function 'raise_nmi': arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:489:2: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] trace_ipi_raise(target, ipi_types[ipinr]); This is a correct warning as we actually overflow the array here. This patch raise_nmi() to call __smp_cross_call() instead of smp_cross_call(), to avoid calling into ftrace. For clarification, I'm also adding a two new code comments describing how this one is special. The warning appears to have shown up after patch e7273ff49acf ("ARM: 8488/1: Make IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE a "non-secure" SGI"), which changed the number assignment from '15' to '8', but as far as I can tell has existed since the IPI tracepoints were first introduced. If we decide to backport this patch to stable kernels, we probably need to backport e7273ff49acf as well. Fixes: e7273ff49acf ("ARM: 8488/1: Make IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE a "non-secure" SGI") Fixes: 365ec7b17327 ("ARM: add IPI tracepoints") # v3.17 Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann [yamada.masahiro@socionext.com: rebase on v5.0-rc1] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- This is a long-standing issue, and Arnd posted this patch two years ago: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/409393.html It is no longer applied, so I rebased it on top of the latest kernel. Changes in v2: None arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h | 1 + arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h index cba23eaa6072..7a88f160b1fb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include #include +/* number of IPIS _not_ including IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE */ #define NR_IPI 7 typedef struct { diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c index facd4240ca02..c93fe0f256de 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ enum ipi_msg_type { IPI_CPU_STOP, IPI_IRQ_WORK, IPI_COMPLETION, + /* + * CPU_BACKTRACE is special and not included in NR_IPI + * or tracable with trace_ipi_* + */ IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE, /* * SGI8-15 can be reserved by secure firmware, and thus may @@ -797,7 +801,7 @@ core_initcall(register_cpufreq_notifier); static void raise_nmi(cpumask_t *mask) { - smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE); + __smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE); } void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, bool exclude_self) -- 2.17.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/