From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCBEC5DF63 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB15C20869 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="k8jfdL1d" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AB15C20869 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wdG+1GcLdMmk1pLjybc0uxrQgnflTUUW6yFydhhDYcM=; b=k8jfdL1dQz8WEz HJNMhjQxSLANf/gFd6zm+3i2KyST5ZMyqkQ0oUeDJ4wqMf5SNLF4bBLBLKtsijEezH7LNfMkaN7x/ t39hwf+etxuQqCE5VcdAmN7A02NXfqmgWE91o/pkM5VQaGBv0rbE5JkJSFVELj7aHQh7Ji+AJl8Z0 t8ZlYEYFb38lfqXnty6n1RIwvlvxi8Yuz25hLLBtmseM1a53pUrSY1IfUXmS7SiDR+pKhxk+DosE7 YRsAR9QiirRhOgeK5Lb2UgrqY+ma4Ms5xq49M+opmN8396tKbFawAuvC6Q3CgvpKM8YOIs07bT+p5 kCt9yla3+RSpesQwVEFg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iSQ3L-00028y-IQ; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 18:29:11 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iSQ3E-00021q-0Z; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 18:29:05 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B095A68AFE; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 19:28:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 19:28:57 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] asm-generic: don't provide ioremap for CONFIG_MMU Message-ID: <20191106182857.GA21062@lst.de> References: <20191029064834.23438-12-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191106_102904_205789_CE5844E1 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.51 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren , sparclinux , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Vincent Chen , Christoph Hellwig , Linux-Arch , linux-s390 , "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." , the arch/x86 maintainers , arcml , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-m68k , Openrisc , Greentime Hu , nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org, Guan Xuetao , Linux ARM , Michal Simek , Parisc List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Palmer Dabbelt , alpha , MTD Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:16:38PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > shouldn't they all just be that first one? In other words, wouldn't it be > > better to always provide the generic ioremap prototype and unify the ports > > instead? > > Agreed. But I'd go for the second one. Eventually we should unify it and only have a single prototype. But we have lots of implementations including inline functions, so this will take a few more steps. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/