linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com>
Cc: Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Alex Bazhaniuk <alex@eclypsium.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci attempts to turn the SPI flash chip writeable
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 07:56:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200725055649.GA1047853@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200724212853.11601-1-daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com>

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 06:28:53PM -0300, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> Currently, intel-spi has a module argument that controls whether the driver
> attempts to turn the SPI flash chip writeable. The default value
> is FALSE (don't try to make it writeable).
> However, this flag applies only for a number of devices, coming from the
> platform driver, whereas the devices detected through the PCI driver
> (intel-spi-pci) are not subject to this check since the configuration
> takes place in intel-spi-pci which doesn't have an argument.
> 
> That's why I propose this patch to add such argument to intel-spi-pci,
> so the user can control whether the driver tries to make the chip
> writeable or not, being the default FALSE as is the argument of
> intel-spi.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi-pci.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi-pci.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi-pci.c
> index 81329f680bec..77e57450f166 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi-pci.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ static const struct intel_spi_boardinfo cnl_info = {
>  	.type = INTEL_SPI_CNL,
>  };
>  
> +static bool writeable;
> +module_param(writeable, bool, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(writeable, "Enable write access to SPI flash chip (default=0)");

Ick, this isn't the 1990's, please do not add new module parameters,
they are a major pain to work with and only work on a global basis, not
on a per-device basis.

No user will remember how to use this, as it isn't documented anywhere
either.  Can you make this a sysfs attribute or something, or better
yet, make it "just work" depending on the device type?

thanks,

greg k-h

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-25  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-24 21:28 [PATCH] Module argument to control whether intel-spi-pci attempts to turn the SPI flash chip writeable Daniel Gutson
2020-07-25  5:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CAFmMkTE_dT9+WJYyb19uQ_HmgJWZSARBy6PveheQJk++NuGbkQ@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-26  7:17     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
     [not found]       ` <CAFmMkTFzGfFDrJrdgHztzLK2K-zBWy6T2Tv+G4-rrbVpbahkgg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-27 15:15         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-27 15:31           ` Daniel Gutson
2020-07-29 20:54             ` Daniel Gutson
2020-07-30  5:31               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
     [not found]                 ` <CAFmMkTHXjfG7zMr0i_h65PvjAe4opPgvzdABH8W1EUGOmcA4Zg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-30 14:09                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-30 14:18                     ` Daniel Gutson
2020-07-30 14:20                       ` Daniel Gutson
2020-08-03  9:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-03 10:18   ` Richard Hughes
2020-08-03 10:27     ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-03 12:58       ` Daniel Gutson
2020-08-03 13:05         ` Mika Westerberg
2020-08-03 13:17           ` Daniel Gutson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200725055649.GA1047853@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alex@eclypsium.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com \
    --cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).