linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	Julien Su <juliensu@mxic.com.tw>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	ycllin@mxic.com.tw, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] mtd: nand: ecc: Add an I/O request tweaking mechanism
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:16:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930101658.024f21d8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930095308.57acb670@windsurf.home>


Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 30 Sep
2020 09:53:08 +0200:

> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:01:05 +0200
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> 
> > +	/* Ensure the request covers the entire page */
> > +	if (true) {//todo (orig->datalen < nanddev_page_size(nand)) {  
> 
> This TODO and "if (true)" looks odd.

Oops, this is a debugging leftover; I don't remember getting a
checkpatch error for that. Surely it did though.

> 
> > +		ctx->bounce_data = true;
> > +		tweak->dataoffs = 0;
> > +		tweak->datalen = nanddev_page_size(nand);
> > +		tweak->databuf.in = ctx->spare_databuf;
> > +		memset(tweak->databuf.in, 0xFF, ctx->page_buffer_size);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (true) {//todo (orig->ooblen < nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand)) {  
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> Also, I find the wording "tweak" a bit vague, "tweak" really means
> nothing specific. What about prepare/unprepare instead of tweak/restore ?

I understand that "tweaking" might be a bit too vague, but
we already have a ->prepare_io_req() hook, from which we call
nand_ecc_tweark_req(). So this really is a helper that is being called
to hide the real user request (maybe a few bytes), in favor of a
'bigger' one (full page).

What about nand_ecc_extend/restore_req()? Other ideas welcome!

> 
> Also, shouldn't nand_ecc_init_req_tweaking() also allocate the struct
> nand_ecc_req_tweak_ctx so that this structure remains internal ?

This mechanism is part of the ECC engine logic, so if the structure is
allocated by nand_ecc_init_req_tweaking(), it means that the function
must return a pointer to the allocated structure, which should be saved
by the ECC engine driver. Instead, I decided to declare the "request
tweaking context" within the ECC engine configuration (which makes
sense IMHO). This is more or less the same, it just prevents an
extra (useless?) allocation. I guess both would work pretty much the
same.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 23:01 [PATCH 00/20] Create generic software ECC engines Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 01/20] mtd: nand: ecc: Add an I/O request tweaking mechanism Miquel Raynal
2020-09-30  7:53   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-09-30  8:16     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-10-30 17:30   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 02/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Move BCH code to the generic NAND layer Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:30   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 03/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Cleanup and style fixes Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:30   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 04/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Stop exporting the private structure Miquel Raynal
2021-01-09 14:46   ` Adam Ford
2021-01-11 10:20     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-12 14:35       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-12 16:01         ` Adam Ford
2021-01-12 17:20           ` Adam Ford
2021-01-14 15:42             ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-15 12:23               ` Adam Ford
2021-01-15 16:06                 ` Adam Ford
2021-01-15 16:17                   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-15 16:28                     ` Adam Ford
2021-01-19 11:56                       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-19 14:21                         ` Adam Ford
2021-01-19 14:36                           ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-19 15:49                             ` Adam Ford
2021-01-19 15:53                               ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 05/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Return only valid error codes Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 06/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Drop mtd_nand_has_bch() Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 07/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Update the prototypes to be more generic Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 08/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Stop using raw NAND structures Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 09/20] mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Create the software BCH engine Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 10/20] mtd: rawnand: Get rid of chip->ecc.priv Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 11/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Move Hamming code to the generic NAND layer Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 12/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Clarify the driver descriptions Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 13/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Drop/fix the kernel doc Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 14/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Cleanup and style fixes Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 15/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Rename the exported functions Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 16/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Stop using raw NAND structures Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 17/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Remove useless includes Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 18/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Let the software Hamming ECC engine be unselected Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:29   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 19/20] mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Create the software Hamming engine Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:28   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-09-29 23:01 ` [PATCH 20/20] mtd: nand: Let software ECC engines be retrieved from the NAND core Miquel Raynal
2020-10-30 17:28   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200930101658.024f21d8@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=ycllin@mxic.com.tw \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).