linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: omap: Use BCH private fields in the specific OOB layout
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:55:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119155510.5655-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> (raw)

The OMAP driver may leverage software BCH logic to locate errors while
using its own hardware to detect the presence of errors. This is
achieved with a "mixed" mode which initializes manually the software
BCH internal logic while providing its own OOB layout.

The issue here comes from the fact that the BCH driver has been
updated to only use generic NAND objects, and no longer depend on raw
NAND structures as it is usable from SPI-NAND as well. However, at the
end of the BCH context initialization, the driver checks the validity
of the OOB layout. At this stage, the raw NAND fields have not been
populated yet while being used by the layout helpers, leading to an
invalid layout.

The chosen solution here is to include the BCH structure definition
and to refer to the BCH fields directly (de-referenced as a const
pointer here) to know as early as possible the number of steps and ECC
bytes which have been chosen.

Note: I don't know which commit exactly triggered the error, but the
entire migration to a generic BCH driver got merged in one go, so this
should not be a problem for stable backports.

Reported-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Fixes: 80fe603160a4 ("mtd: nand: ecc-bch: Stop using raw NAND structures")
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
index fbb9955f2467..2c3e65cb68f3 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap2.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
+#include <linux/mtd/nand-ecc-sw-bch.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
 #include <linux/omap-dma.h>
@@ -1866,18 +1867,19 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops omap_ooblayout_ops = {
 static int omap_sw_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 				 struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
 {
-	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
+	struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
+	const struct nand_ecc_sw_bch_conf *engine_conf = nand->ecc.ctx.priv;
 	int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
 
-	if (section >= chip->ecc.steps)
+	if (section >= engine_conf->nsteps)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	/*
 	 * When SW correction is employed, one OMAP specific marker byte is
 	 * reserved after each ECC step.
 	 */
-	oobregion->offset = off + (section * (chip->ecc.bytes + 1));
-	oobregion->length = chip->ecc.bytes;
+	oobregion->offset = off + (section * (engine_conf->code_size + 1));
+	oobregion->length = engine_conf->code_size;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1885,7 +1887,8 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 				  struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
 {
-	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
+	struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
+	const struct nand_ecc_sw_bch_conf *engine_conf = nand->ecc.ctx.priv;
 	int off = BADBLOCK_MARKER_LENGTH;
 
 	if (section)
@@ -1895,7 +1898,7 @@ static int omap_sw_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 	 * When SW correction is employed, one OMAP specific marker byte is
 	 * reserved after each ECC step.
 	 */
-	off += ((chip->ecc.bytes + 1) * chip->ecc.steps);
+	off += ((engine_conf->code_size + 1) * engine_conf->nsteps);
 	if (off >= mtd->oobsize)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
-- 
2.20.1


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 15:55 Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-01-19 16:05 ` [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: omap: Use BCH private fields in the specific OOB layout Adam Ford
2021-01-20 22:39 ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119155510.5655-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).