Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/9] arm64: bcmbca: Move BCM4908 SoC support under ARCH_BCMBCA

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: William Zhang <william.zhang@broadcom.com>,
	Linux ARM List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: joel.peshkin@broadcom.com, dan.beygelman@broadcom.com,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
	"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS"
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY DEVICES (MTD)"
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS"
	<linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/9] arm64: bcmbca: Move BCM4908 SoC support under ARCH_BCMBCA
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:33:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2492407a-49a8-4672-b117-4e027db09400@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40cec207-9463-d999-5fc9-8a7514e24b91@gmail.com>


On 7/20/2022 8:32 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/20/2022 5:06 PM, William Zhang wrote:
>> RESEND to include linux arm kernel mailing list.
>>
>> Now that Broadcom Broadband arch ARCH_BCMBCA is in the kernel, this 
>> change
>> set migrates the existing broadband chip BCM4908 support to ARCH_BCMBCA.
> 
> Looks like only 1, 2 4 and 5 made it to bcm-kernel-feedback-list meaning 
> that our patchwork instance did not pick them all up.
> 
> Did you use patman to send these patches? If so, you might still need to 
> make sure that the final CC list includes the now (ex) BCM4908 
> maintainer and the ARM SoC maintainer for Broadcom changes.

And the threading was broken because the patches 1-9 were not in 
response to your cover letter.
-- 
Florian

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/