From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: mt25qu: Ignore 6th ID byte
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:13:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85251c3b-13c1-8b24-0ce2-6793ea55e39a@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9589af968d7b9dafbce17325dbf8472@walle.cc>
Dear maintainers!
On 22/11/2021 16:05, Michael Walle wrote:
> Thanks, so that's the SFDP data for the mt25qu256aba8e12-1sit part. and the
> jedec id is 20bb19104473, correct?
While we are at this part, I've encountered another issue:
The chip supports 1-1-1, 1-1-4 and 1-4-4 write OPs in extended SPI mode,
while only 1-1-0 erase. (as well as 4-4-4/4-4-0, but that's not the issue here,
I think).
Now the erase code (chip/sector) uses spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->write_proto)
in both functions.
In my opinion, as I look into Micron or Macronix datasheets, write_proto has little to
do with erase_proto. (there is currently no separate erase_proto)
Before I come up with a totally wrong patch, wanted to ask your opinion, how should
it be solved, what do you think?
I do not see any erase-related tables for this in JESD216C.
I also cannot come up with an example of a chip with erase != 1-1-0.
Shall I hardcode 1-1-0 for erase?
Shall I introduce erase_proto? What would be the logic for its setting/discovery?
--
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-19 8:04 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: mt25qu: Ignore 6th ID byte Alexander A Sverdlin
2021-11-19 21:19 ` Michael Walle
2021-11-22 7:06 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-11-22 15:05 ` Michael Walle
2021-11-23 7:45 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-11-23 8:14 ` Michael Walle
2021-11-23 12:40 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-11-23 14:01 ` Michael Walle
2021-11-23 16:14 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2021-11-23 12:13 ` Alexander Sverdlin [this message]
2021-11-23 17:42 ` Pratyush Yadav
2021-11-25 7:26 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-11-30 9:49 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-07-18 15:03 ` Tudor.Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85251c3b-13c1-8b24-0ce2-6793ea55e39a@nokia.com \
--to=alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).