From: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: esmt: Use correct name of f25l32qa
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:19:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7fca59e-f7f5-f5f8-9e3b-001c5c938659@gorani.run> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dad2160dba9070f1516519bdd00207ac@walle.cc>
On 2021-07-17 01:11, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-06-20 10:56, schrieb Sungbo Eo:
>> The flash ID of F25L32QA is 0x8c4016, whereas that of F25L32QA(2S) is
>> 0x8c4116. F25L32QA(2S) is the newer version of F25L32QA and its BPn bits
>> are non-volatile, unlike its older version.
>>
>> References:
>> https://www.esmt.com.tw/upload/pdf/ESMT/datasheets/F25L32QA.pdf
>> References:
>> https://www.esmt.com.tw/upload/pdf/ESMT/datasheets/F25L32QA_1(2S).pdf
>
> "Datasheet:" please
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run>
>> ---
>> At first I was going to send a new support patch of F25L16PA(2S),
>> but before that, I wanted to make sure if "(2s)" suffix is okay or
>> unnecessary.
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/esmt.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/esmt.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/esmt.c
>> index cfc9218c1053..51b3ff764ef6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/esmt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/esmt.c
>> @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ static const struct flash_info esmt_parts[] = {
>> /* ESMT */
>> { "f25l32pa", INFO(0x8c2016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64,
>> SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_SWP_IS_VOLATILE) },
>> - { "f25l32qa", INFO(0x8c4116, 0, 64 * 1024, 64,
>> - SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
>> + { "f25l32qa(2s)", INFO(0x8c4116, 0, 64 * 1024, 64,
>> + SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
>> { "f25l64qa", INFO(0x8c4117, 0, 64 * 1024, 128,
>> SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) },
>> };
>
> Tudor has decide on that name - or the use of parentheses. I don't have a
> strong opinion on it.
I'm concerned that any other devices do not contain parentheses in their
model names... I'm fine with "f25l32qa-2s" if preferred.
>
> FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Thanks for your review!
>
> -michael
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-19 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-20 8:56 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: esmt: Use correct name of f25l32qa Sungbo Eo
2021-07-16 16:11 ` Michael Walle
2021-07-19 15:19 ` Sungbo Eo [this message]
2021-07-21 7:32 ` Michael Walle
2021-07-23 14:10 ` Sungbo Eo
2021-07-19 15:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Sungbo Eo
2021-07-23 14:12 ` [PATCH v3] " Sungbo Eo
2022-07-19 10:11 ` Tudor Ambarus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7fca59e-f7f5-f5f8-9e3b-001c5c938659@gorani.run \
--to=mans0n@gorani.run \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).