From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Chen-Tsung Hsieh <chentsung@chromium.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: core: Check written SR value in spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check()
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:18:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea37e84c8c83350d089c6c9ed4474851@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMu4cy5onQ2JNKhoLVmR4Nb7Cqv2L59SoE=2Q9CK8bhfPvvHTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 2022-01-27 04:31, schrieb Chen-Tsung Hsieh:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 6:38 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, on what flash did you discover this?
>
> It's Winbond W25Q64JWZPIM
> https://www.winbond.com/hq/product/code-storage-flash-memory/serial-nor-flash/?__locale=en&partNo=W25Q64JW
>
> We are verifying the write protection on W25Q64JWZPIM and run into an
> issue that spi_nor_sr_unlock() always return success even if HW & SW
> write protection are both enabled.
Ah that ring a bell... Anyway, could you dump the SFDP data please?
See [1], you'll find the files in sysfs. I wonder why that flash is
using the 16bit write at all.
-michael
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/4304e19f3399a0a6e856119d01ccabe0@walle.cc/
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-26 7:32 [RESEND PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: core: Check written SR value in spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() Chen-Tsung Hsieh
2022-01-26 22:38 ` Michael Walle
2022-01-27 3:31 ` Chen-Tsung Hsieh
2022-01-27 9:18 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2022-01-27 18:27 ` Chen-Tsung Hsieh
2022-01-31 17:19 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-27 7:11 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-27 7:14 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-27 8:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-27 10:51 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-27 9:31 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea37e84c8c83350d089c6c9ed4474851@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=chentsung@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).