From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCA5C2D0B1 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F251A2192A for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="tLxCMCB4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726406AbgBDKEp (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:04:45 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:34578 "EHLO mail-wm1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726343AbgBDKEp (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:04:45 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id s144so1836373wme.1 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 02:04:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9i8R9bI1KU8imWN9Jn2mGLP1QeS6cJKLjdfeB3bx5O8=; b=tLxCMCB4IVaQLxQqCSiVlultb4wa84G+dnzF6oyQMftTgT0DxEeFbCQiWEVAJgver2 KLpGGYLpjfzXqv5j9kZXSLbGmzFiO+wUM2Nu6TiEyM5Wt3bu4J+Xj5bJqzNk4q6HkLVa 1Nlinf+Rx4ryqdI4j2UWR+LOlMcn5kdDdmslYIrYV6UfMhuBYya1plRq/QYkC7tepnYS Xcb7BGPDD7FzZQngqk4yzaiL9q7DP8OLJPgztPBbNvavllWm06PoTT/rUtuyPnROd9Zs HFuhZ2xa/Lm+q8GEuiG2f0VyviYmjTfT/Oos0C51BVhkm5Ez0ZyQgqVwwYkVAfkWt80e scsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9i8R9bI1KU8imWN9Jn2mGLP1QeS6cJKLjdfeB3bx5O8=; b=IvLSZ3q9ZDhH8dsEdGvv36ZgrOl0aE/3dBDPie4d2bNLnK+RKbPX60XoH1hqO3uJWi jiECZ3ddxg4S0rV7rA+ti0g82CLDGDAU/5lUKVrhYTccrsJRPAU1/cNpxJsf364oOIAb yELSuSxZQ/Veal3KAb0qJAMjeW7UbhxplDZydHQQY1HMnv7DWavgeplmW1zER5/lhtDK YMXZ/HUsHg7Djfc1HqmIHqmDqo+Og04/BLaLLhfmBchZT506PGCdZEcQR7Vaj2H4xtWh bfpDXroIxXrim1RzHIe86lqX/cB38J9RAtiHA+0Rj6T/jLSwm+SSWdUDk4J8eLCJLKC9 dIcw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV21bEtGf0/s7lLo/agohw57gI2oqfxODcEPZAoPgOQ/TGaeecp naopd5++eniGDmU0ve/C/W073A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxx+5W18S0xB5ATNIg1V8iOT2hjAUdASDl14nMAGmbITjnzvlj+8JRyDy6zJOIdO0vGV7a+Lw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4e03:: with SMTP id g3mr4885617wmh.22.1580810682684; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 02:04:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.86.34] (cpc89974-aztw32-2-0-cust43.18-1.cable.virginm.net. [86.30.250.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r15sm3023217wmh.21.2020.02.04.02.04.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 02:04:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree To: Lee Jones , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pierre-Louis Bossart References: <20200204140300.7537283c@canb.auug.org.au> <20200204075304.GE15069@dell> From: Srinivas Kandagatla Message-ID: <0a4c9e64-34e1-d2cd-fb5c-8b11021265f1@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:04:40 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200204075304.GE15069@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 04/02/2020 07:53, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >> allyesconfig) failed like this: >> >> ld: sound/soc/codecs/wcd934x.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to `of_clk_src_simple_get' >> ld: sound/soc/codecs/wcd934x.o: in function `.wcd934x_codec_probe': >> wcd934x.c:(.text.wcd934x_codec_probe+0x3d4): undefined reference to `.__clk_get_name' >> ld: wcd934x.c:(.text.wcd934x_codec_probe+0x438): undefined reference to `.clk_hw_register' >> ld: wcd934x.c:(.text.wcd934x_codec_probe+0x474): undefined reference to `.of_clk_add_provider' > > What's the cause of this? I thought PowerPC made use of the CCF? Looks like the allyesconfig is not selecting COMMON_CLK for some reason, and SND_SOC_WCD934X is missing "depends on COMMON_CLK" in Kconfig I will send a fix for that! --srini > >> Caused by commit >> >> 6ac7e4d7ad70 ("mfd: wcd934x: Add support to wcd9340/wcd9341 codec") > > Looks to me like the Codec is broken, rather than the MFD driver. > >> Unfortunately that commit is now in Linus' tree (and was never in >> linux-next). >> >> I marked CONFIG_MFD_STMFX as BROKEN for now. > > Surely that should be SND_SOC_WCD934X? > > Srini, > > What do you plan to do about this? >