linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfio tree with the kvms390 tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:00:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f498561-4bd3-3247-4ef4-796dc15cdaf3@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711171353.2b8eb09a@canb.auug.org.au>

Am 11.07.22 um 09:13 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Betreff:
> linux-next: manual merge of the vfio tree with the kvms390 tree
> Von:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Datum:
> 11.07.22, 09:13
> 
> An:
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> Kopie (CC):
> Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfio tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
> 
> between commits:
> 
>    b6a7066f4e9b ("vfio/pci: introduce CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM")
>    6518ebc68c72 ("vfio-pci/zdev: add open/close device hooks")
> 
> from the kvms390 tree and commit:
> 
>    d1877e639bc6 ("vfio: de-extern-ify function prototypes")
> 
> from the vfio tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Alex, Paolo,

I do have a topic branch that we could merge, but I think the conflict is trivial enough for the time being.

      reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11  7:13 linux-next: manual merge of the vfio tree with the kvms390 tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-11  8:00 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f498561-4bd3-3247-4ef4-796dc15cdaf3@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).