linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: s390/driver-core merge conflict
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:22:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212063775.16984.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080529135839.aa17b44f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:58 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got conflicts in
> drivers/s390/block/dasd.c, drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c,
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_fba.c, drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c,
> drivers/s390/cio/device_fsm.c, drivers/s390/net/claw.c,
> drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c and drivers/s390/net/lcs.c between commit
> bd24b944eb93549b1ca5becbf27c7373504f7eed ("driver-core: prepare for
> removal of 20 char limit from struct device") from the driver-core tree
> and commits 17ae2c0d4d27d73fb264e204e385bf5436349f36 ("[S390] cio:
> introduce fcx enabled scsw format") and
> 8e4dac6f0f36686984ed3f01b977259e3127433b ("[S390] cio: provide functions
> for fcx enabled I/O") from the s390 tree.
> 
> I merged all the dev_name changes from driver-core into the s390 changes.
> Someone might like to check it.

It builds fine and it boots. Not too bad I would say.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.



  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-29 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-29  3:58 linux-next: s390/driver-core merge conflict Stephen Rothwell
2008-05-29 12:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2008-05-29 13:05   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212063775.16984.4.camel@localhost \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).