From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaswinder Singh Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:36:17 +0530 Message-ID: <1216191977.3394.5.camel@jaswinder.satnam> References: <20080716120219.a3de00bd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:47405 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751090AbYGPHHL (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:07:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080716120219.a3de00bd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Greg KH , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , David Woodhouse Hello Stephen, On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:02 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in > drivers/usb/serial/io_ti.c between commit > d12b219a228efe92f0778ed3af21305e65fbb052 ("edgeport-ti: use > request_firmware()") from Linus' tree and commit > 1f023570c8d00d3511799ccad21dc3525a6160e1 ("USB: io_ti: FIrst cut at a big > clean up") from the usb tree. > > This conflict used to be in the firmware tree and my solution then was to > remove the commit now in Linus' tree because the fixup was going to take > to long. Now my solution is to remove the commit from the usb tree. > I am checking linux-next tree : git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git I think you already merged alan patch to it but firmware patch is not installed yet. So I am going to check alan patch manually. And after confirmation that alan patch is fully installed then I will install firmware patch and send to all of you. Thank you, Jaswinder Singh.