linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: SCSI git tree splitting into scsi-misc-2.6 and scsi-post-merge-2.6
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:34:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220632443.3331.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080905161212.e3612601.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Due to conflicts with block#for-2.6.28 I'm splitting the tree to resolve
them.  The two trees are now

git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-post-merge-2.6.git
git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git

scsi-misc-2.6 will keep things that have no external dependencies, so
will be merged very early in the merge window.  scsi-post-merge-2.6 will
keep the other tree dependent pieces, and so won't be able to go until
after the other trees have gone in.

Since the trees will evolve semi-independently, you'll need to pull both
in to get all the changes.

Instructions for linux-next:

You need to include the scsi-post-merge-2.6 tree last (or at least after
all its component trees) and only the pieces from merge-base..master
(that will insulate you from rebasing effects).

James

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-05 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-05  6:12 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-05  6:22 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-05 13:58   ` James Bottomley
2008-09-05 16:34 ` James Bottomley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220632443.3331.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).