From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:38:24 +1000 Message-ID: <1305869904.7481.145.camel@pasglop> References: <20110520141425.dd38cb7d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:53052 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935321Ab1ETFjB (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 01:39:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110520141425.dd38cb7d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milton Miller , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in > arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c between commit 23d72bfd8f9f ("powerpc: > Consolidate ipi message mux and demux") from the powerpc tree and commit > 184748cc50b2 ("sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to > smp_send_reschedule()") from the tip tree. > > The former superceded part of the latter's changes, so I just used the > former for that. I've done the merge and resolved the conflict properly (it's actually non trivial due to some other changes) in the powerpc tree, I'll send a pull request to Linus later today. Cheers, Ben.