From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: Fix compillation issues in device_prep_dma_cyclic() Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:10:09 +0530 Message-ID: <1348476009.1943.187.camel@vkoul-udesk3> References: <20120924133923.130c4db72aa8105cb5647d7a@canb.auug.org.au> <1348473485-5081-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:57818 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755255Ab2IXIpb (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 04:45:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1348473485-5081-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 10:58 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hello, > > The reason for the breakage is the patch 1 got lost somewhere in the process. > I also greped the whole tree for device_prep_dma_cyclic() and the second patch > is the result of that. > > PS: I did build tested the series on ARM (OMAP), x86_32, x86_64 but not for ppc > for sure. I though patch 1 was part of the series Mark was supposed to apply. Anyway both look fine to me so: Both Acked-By: Vinod Koul -- ~Vinod