From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:23:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1348550602.26828.1918.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20120925123438.bbf3126889513ee5cc195e5c@canb.auug.org.au> <1348549842.26828.1897.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120925.011343.1495275645575636949.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120925.011343.1495275645575636949.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:13 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:10:42 +0200 > > > Oops, my bad, net/ipv4/raw.c changes in 5640f7685831 ("net: use a per > > task frag allocator") should not be there : > > > > I accidentally left a debugging version of the patch I sent to fix the > > icmp bug. > > > > Sorry David for this, I am not sure how I can help on this ? > > The thing to do is send me a patch to revert the raw.c change from > net-next, right? Sure, I'll do that after my breakfast and some coffee ;)