From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:55:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362196529.1231.80.camel@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130302144229.f41f56c36992497a1530d65f@canb.auug.org.au>
On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 14:42 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:45:18 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 13:47 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the ftrace tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c: In function 'ftrace_dump_buf':
> > > kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:29:33: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct trace_array_cpu')
> > > kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c:86:33: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct trace_array_cpu')
> > >
> > > Caused by commit eaac1836c10e ("tracing: Replace the static global
> > > per_cpu arrays with allocated per_cpu").
> > >
> > > I have used the ftrace tree from next-20130228 for today.
> >
> > I rebased, and it should all be good now. I also fixed breakage to the
> > new snapshot feature. Here's my diff:
>
> Of course, I wonder if this is intended for the current merge window
> (since it turned up in linux-next so late). If not, then please don;t
> put it in your -next included branch until after -rc1 is released. If
> you are aiming for this merge window, then good luck! ;-)
>
Oh crap, sorry. Quite the contrary. I should have waited for -rc1 as
this is intended for v3.10.
I made some major changes and wanted testing on it as soon as possible.
I've done tons of testing on my own but I wanted a broader audience. Do
you want me to pull my tree and reset it to what is only for 3.9?
All changes I wanted for 3.9 have already made it into Linus's tree.
Everything I've been pushing is destined for 3.10. But as I said. They
are big changes and wanted testing on them early. But it can wait for an
-rc1 window.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-02 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-01 2:47 linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01 3:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 2:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 3:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-02 3:55 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-03-02 4:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-02 4:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-02 4:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-21 7:32 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-21 10:50 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-11-21 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21 14:23 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-11-21 14:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-11-21 12:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-03 7:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-03 15:10 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-06-03 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-03 15:24 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-06-03 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-03 21:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-10 8:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-10 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-10 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-15 6:51 ` Mark-PK Tsai
2022-01-12 0:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 1:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 1:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14 2:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14 2:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 3:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 3:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14 3:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 3:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14 5:12 ` Yinan Liu
2022-01-14 6:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-23 2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-23 3:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-10-23 13:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-26 1:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-26 1:21 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362196529.1231.80.camel@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).