From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:12:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375891974.8154.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807155918.GA16263@orbit.nwl.cc>
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 17:59 +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> The idea behind this patch is that users setting the protocol to
> something else probably do know better and so should be left alone.
Regardless of that, I think that still the skb pointers would be changed
by this patch which would confuse the receiver of the SKB (device
driver), no? Has anyone verified that theory? :)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 5:54 linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-07 8:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-07 15:59 ` Phil Sutter
2013-08-07 16:12 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-08-07 16:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-07 16:22 ` Johannes Berg
2013-08-07 16:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-07 17:47 ` David Miller
2013-08-07 18:37 ` Phil Sutter
2013-08-07 23:27 ` David Miller
2013-08-07 23:36 ` David Miller
2013-08-08 0:02 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-08-08 0:09 ` David Miller
2013-08-08 0:13 ` David Miller
2013-08-08 0:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-09 13:58 ` Phil Sutter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-07 5:47 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-07 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-07 8:36 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-08 5:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-08 15:54 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-08-07 11:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-07 6:44 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-07 8:50 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-07 7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-07 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375891974.8154.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).