From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pawel Moll Subject: [PATCH] bus: arm-ccn: Use hrtimer_start() Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:21:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1431530484-3389-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> References: Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36460 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934441AbbEMPWA (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 11:22:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: arm@kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Mark Brown , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation. Reported-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll --- Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This patch solves the linux-next build issue reported by Mark Brown: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/35377 and is an equivalent of the following change: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142904610220085 Could you, please, queue it? Thanks! drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c index df5f307..7d9879e 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c @@ -921,9 +921,8 @@ static void arm_ccn_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags) * attribute). */ if (!ccn->irq) - __hrtimer_start_range_ns(&ccn->dt.hrtimer, - arm_ccn_pmu_timer_period(), 0, - HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED, 0); + hrtimer_start(&ccn->dt.hrtimer, arm_ccn_pmu_timer_period(), + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED); /* Set the DT bus input, engaging the counter */ arm_ccn_pmu_xp_dt_config(event, 1); -- 2.1.0