From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Chaya Rachel Ivgi <chaya.rachel.ivgi@intel.com>,
Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:27:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507832866.5497.2.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012182114.fdeiv67ebx7c63te@sirena.co.uk>
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 19:21 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:16:36PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>
> > This is weird... The previous conflict was the exact opposite of
> > this.
> > 44fd09 came in from wireless-drivers and dd05f9 came from wireless-
> > drivers-next. I don't understand why it is saying the opposite
> > here...
>
> I may have confused the trees when I was pasting things in, the
> commits
> are filled in by hand.
Ah, okay. But still, if the same patches conflicted twice, why wasn't
there only one occurrence with both conflicts at once?
--
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 17:25 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree Mark Brown
2017-10-12 18:16 ` Luciano Coelho
2017-10-12 18:21 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-12 18:27 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2017-10-12 18:35 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-12 18:50 ` Luca Coelho
2017-10-12 18:59 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-12 19:02 ` Luca Coelho
2017-10-12 18:29 ` Luca Coelho
2017-10-12 19:12 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-24 0:16 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-24 7:00 ` Kalle Valo
2020-03-24 7:29 ` Luca Coelho
2020-03-24 8:07 ` Kalle Valo
2019-10-31 0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31 9:36 ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-30 4:08 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-30 5:30 ` Luciano Coelho
2019-04-15 2:08 Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20190415120853.39e0e46a-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-18 13:49 ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-15 2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-18 13:49 ` Kalle Valo
2018-04-26 1:09 Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20180426110917.446204af-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2018-04-26 7:38 ` Luciano Coelho
2018-04-26 10:33 ` Kalle Valo
2018-04-26 11:51 ` Luciano Coelho
2017-12-08 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-08 12:30 ` Kalle Valo
2017-10-12 17:20 Mark Brown
2017-10-12 17:14 Mark Brown
2015-05-25 3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-01 9:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-01-16 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507832866.5497.2.camel@intel.com \
--to=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chaya.rachel.ivgi@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).