From: Mimi Zohar <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Stephen Rothwell <email@example.com> Cc: linux-next <firstname.lastname@example.org>, linux-integrity <email@example.com>, Jeff Layton <firstname.lastname@example.org>, James Morris <email@example.com> Subject: Re: ima: temporary "next-queued-testing" branch (UPDATE) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:30:47 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> Hi Stephen, On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 17:02 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 07:47 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > Hi - > > > > Before upstreaming "ima: re-introduce own integrity cache lock", I've > > pushed the following patches to the next-queued-testing branch for > > testing. We'll resync with the linux-security tree based on -rc3, > > hopefully next week. > > > > d79d361c25d7 ima: re-introduce own integrity cache lock > > 4e94bcf160f2 ima: support new "hash" and "dont_hash" policy actions > > bd1fa1e14733 ima: Fix line continuation format > > cf46932b9a02 ima: pass filename to ima_rdwr_violation_check() > > 4aad0b3845e4 ima: log message to module appraisal error > > We're now sync'ed with the security tree next-general branch. There > are a few differences, nothing major, between the "next-queued- > testing" branch and the "next-integrity" branch. > > For those posting IMA/EVM patches, please base them on the > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git next-integrity > branch. > > Sorry for any inconveniences this might have caused. As the integrity subsystem is now back in sync with the security tree, I'd really appreciate if you could include the integrity tree in linux-next. Instead of including the integrity "next" branch as previously, could you include the "next-integrity" branch instead? thanks! Mimi
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 15:30 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <firstname.lastname@example.org> [not found] ` <email@example.com> 2017-12-18 15:30 ` Mimi Zohar [this message] 2017-12-18 20:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: ima: temporary "next-queued-testing" branch (UPDATE)' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).