From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:57:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1599012.kNnWTW8njt@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <20130220125555.46e16e16836ba48f70beb3a9@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:40247 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756355Ab3BTMum (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:50:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130220125555.46e16e16836ba48f70beb3a9@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , Bjorn Helgaas Hi, On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:55:55 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c between commit 181380b702ee ("PCI/ACPI: Don't > cache _PRT, and don't associate them with bus numbers") from the pci tree > and commit bc9b6407bd6d ("ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices > depending on power resources") from the pm tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Thanks for the notice and fix. Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.