From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Janusz Krzysztofik Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the omap_dss2 tree Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:55:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1678557.FviZqEVemH@vclass> References: <20120308165116.d400947f35e40a923e9c6ad0@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120308165116.d400947f35e40a923e9c6ad0@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomi Valkeinen , Tony Lindgren List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 of March 2012 16:51:16 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c between commit ddba6c7f7ec6 > ("OMAP1: pass LCD config with omapfb_set_lcd_config()") from the > omap_dss2 tree and commits 5ca6180fa6d7 ("ARM: OMAP1: ams-delta: > supersede custom led device by leds-gpio") and 2e3ee9f45b3c ("ARM: OMAP1: > Move most of plat/io.h into local iomap.h") from the arm-soc tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Hi, Your resolution looks good to me, thanks! Janusz