From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shamir Rabinovitch <shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:24:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16f0ac6227f948165b7062a72e1fa82f1dfe4697.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190227112522.2f32b5d7@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1101 bytes --]
On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 11:25 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 6fa8f1afd337 ("IB/{core,uverbs}: Move ib_umem_xxx functions from ib_core to ib_uverbs")
>
> from the rdma tree and commit:
>
> f4b6bcc7002f ("net: devlink: turn devlink into a built-in")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen, we'll add it to the (largish this release) list of
conflicts to bring to Linus' attention.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-27 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-27 0:25 linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-27 16:24 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2019-02-28 9:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-28 0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28 7:48 ` Saeed Mahameed
2021-10-19 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-08 3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-08 12:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-09 7:49 ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-05-09 7:40 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-06-20 2:15 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-18 0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-18 10:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-08-02 2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 23:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27 2:33 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27 2:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-07-27 3:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27 5:03 ` Parav Pandit
2018-07-27 4:57 ` Parav Pandit
2018-07-27 5:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-31 21:12 ` Parav Pandit
2018-08-01 5:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-01 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-08-01 18:30 ` Parav Pandit
2018-07-02 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16f0ac6227f948165b7062a72e1fa82f1dfe4697.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).