From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: LTP: diotest4.c:476: read to read-only space. returns 0: Success
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:38:54 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1757087132.11450258.1573468734360.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111083815.GA29540@infradead.org>
----- Original Message -----
> Is this a new test?
No, it's not new.
> If not why was this never reported? Sounds like
> we should add this test case to xfstests.
I'm guessing not that many users still run 32bit kernels.
Naresh' setup is using ext4, so I assume he noticed only
after recent changes in linux-next wrt. directio and ext4.
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 13:59 LTP: diotest4.c:476: read to read-only space. returns 0: Success Naresh Kamboju
2019-11-08 0:20 ` Jan Stancek
2019-11-11 1:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-11 8:19 ` Jan Stancek
2019-11-11 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-11 10:28 ` [PATCH] iomap: fix return value of iomap_dio_bio_actor on 32bit systems Jan Stancek
2019-11-11 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-12 1:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-11-11 10:38 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-11-11 18:26 ` LTP: diotest4.c:476: read to read-only space. returns 0: Success Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1757087132.11450258.1573468734360.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).