linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Okash Khawaja <osk@fb.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:23:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1774afa4-5b21-61f1-e921-4102a1950771@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801113508.54323706@canb.auug.org.au>



On 7/31/18 6:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    573b3aa69406 ("tools/bpftool: fix a percpu_array map dump problem")
> 
> from the bpf tree and commit:
> 
>    2d3feca8c44f ("bpf: btf: print map dump and lookup with btf info")
> 
> from the net-next tree.

The merge looks good to me. Thanks!

> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-01  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-01  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-01  4:23 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-22  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-08  3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-08  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29  1:29 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29  8:28 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-07-16  1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-26  3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-26  5:45 ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-06  1:34 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-20  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-20  0:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-02-20  0:45   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-02-20  1:03     ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-20  0:48   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-02-20  3:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-12-14  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-03  2:16 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-03  2:03 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-26  1:19 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-26 15:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2018-01-09  0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-09  0:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1774afa4-5b21-61f1-e921-4102a1950771@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osk@fb.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --subject='Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox