From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D3CC48BD3 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BC1217D7 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="tO2G+Zjc" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726227AbfFZQBx (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:01:53 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:45670 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726157AbfFZQBx (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:01:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GnPHeYQAyV1bj18lebqeKcP5mH5ZIM5W4pKT9Ho81xg=; b=tO2G+Zjcc4QuYrS5gBSZXJcGGd xtVkG432/Sdz/qEa6WG6V+xeN9gxQmd38CGR+RW1L/V6opA+js4Vbx8yUdC6FR+Deau+WGuIPf+O+ xx+vj/pz8ghtFYvDke3WnfFALJTtQ0HDT8AKbP1f9EACdfndQx/QGDzmJm5C7juX3smTINFmMuUEu Ab5XoyWQidj9J8qhqIT0CEUu0Xigho7q4XiHE9owC6MOUjCTrTCqVDV46CDdRhu0RaUXuZ3GyFuVE Gd1LQurM3QCySstulvWx7YzNA1yu5JIrIQkGqo1kq6NqEqNP/2HlRYeCRLDBSoHlDqekaGpLrHQYB Sjj8u8vQ==; Received: from static-50-53-52-16.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net ([50.53.52.16] helo=dragon.dunlab) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgAMp-000888-9V; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:01:51 +0000 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (task_struct: cached_requested_key) To: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Howells References: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <1d868a7a-0a15-e2b1-d73b-13d9229855ad@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:01:49 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190626231617.1e858da3@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 6/26/19 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The sparc64 builds are broken in this tree, sorry. > > Changes since 20190625: > > > The keys tree gained conflicts aginst the ecryptfs and integrity trees. Multiple build errors like this when CONFIG_KEYS is not set/enabled: (this was seen on one i386 build) # CONFIG_KEYS is not set CONFIG_KEYS_REQUEST_CACHE=y CC arch/x86/crypto/crc32-pclmul_glue.o In file included from ../include/linux/export.h:45:0, from ../include/linux/linkage.h:7, from ../include/linux/kernel.h:8, from ../arch/x86/entry/common.c:10: ../include/linux/tracehook.h: In function ‘tracehook_notify_resume’: ../include/linux/tracehook.h:191:22: error: ‘struct task_struct’ has no member named ‘cached_requested_key’ if (unlikely(current->cached_requested_key)) { ^ -- ~Randy