Hi Pierre, On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 Pierre Ossman wrote: > > That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for > for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary. What it allows me to do, though, is drop your "next" tree if things go really bad without dropping fixes for Linus' current tree that you deem necessary. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/