From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:19:01 +1000 Message-ID: <20080520141901.6395a2a1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20080519174120.2083ea57.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1211222520.30161.3.camel@dhcppc1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__20_May_2008_14_19_01_+1000_EvQ5ZPP63iJl/jjc" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:33705 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbYETETJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2008 00:19:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1211222520.30161.3.camel@dhcppc1> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Meyer Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML --Signature=_Tue__20_May_2008_14_19_01_+1000_EvQ5ZPP63iJl/jjc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Thomas, On Mon, 19 May 2008 20:42:00 +0200 Thomas Meyer wrote: > > Is it intentional that kernel.release is: >=20 > $ cat include/config/kernel.release=20 > 2.6.26-rc3-next-20080519-sched-devel.git >=20 > all predecessors have had names like: > =EF=BB=BF2.6.26-rc2-next-20080516 It was not intentional, I missed it sneaking in. It seems to be gone again today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__20_May_2008_14_19_01_+1000_EvQ5ZPP63iJl/jjc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMlE5TgG2atn1QN8RAtrKAJ0eozOwI60iRtYIGMcm6kz9ptBjrwCeOHK9 NRPBTe0eATOS4G+GVQa3/zI= =rfqt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__20_May_2008_14_19_01_+1000_EvQ5ZPP63iJl/jjc--