From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-next: Tree for May 21 - build failure with netfilter on __nf_ct_helper_find() Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:52:14 +1000 Message-ID: <20080521225214.507eb400.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20080521155936.466bbe86.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080521113230.GA10830@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__21_May_2008_22_52_14_+1000_rBaH_X1/r62uLNH." Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080521113230.GA10830@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kamalesh Babulal Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Wed__21_May_2008_22_52_14_+1000_rBaH_X1/r62uLNH. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kamalesh, On Wed, 21 May 2008 17:02:30 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > The next-20080521 kernel build fails, on x86_64 machine=20 >=20 > CC net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.o > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c: In function =E2=80=98__nf_ct_helper_= find=E2=80=99: > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:58: error: implicit declaration of fu= nction =E2=80=98hlist_for_each_entry_rcu=E2=80=99 > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:58: error: =E2=80=98hnode=E2=80=99 un= declared (first use in this function) > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:58: error: (Each undeclared identifie= r is reported only once > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:58: error: for each function it appea= rs in.) > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:58: error: expected =E2=80=98;=E2=80= =99 before =E2=80=98{=E2=80=99 token > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:50: warning: unused variable =E2=80= =98mask=E2=80=99 > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c: In function =E2=80=98__nf_conntrack_= helper_find_byname=E2=80=99: > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:74: error: =E2=80=98hnode=E2=80=99 un= declared (first use in this function) > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:74: error: expected =E2=80=98;=E2=80= =99 before =E2=80=98{=E2=80=99 token > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c: In function =E2=80=98nf_conntrack_he= lper_register=E2=80=99: > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:117: error: implicit declaration of f= unction =E2=80=98hlist_add_head_rcu=E2=80=99 > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c: In function =E2=80=98nf_conntrack_he= lper_unregister=E2=80=99: > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c:133: error: implicit declaration of f= unction =E2=80=98hlist_del_rcu=E2=80=99 > make[2]: *** [net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [net/netfilter] Error 2 > make: *** [net] Error 2 Thanks for the report and patch. This looks like it is probably broken in Linus' kernel. What config did you use to get the error? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Wed__21_May_2008_22_52_14_+1000_rBaH_X1/r62uLNH. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFINBsDTgG2atn1QN8RAhb2AJ4xGMMpLnPPLFeDJwmXYNi+snWeLwCfchDo nPxdtdMErTq6mJztE+lS2v4= =pl8f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__21_May_2008_22_52_14_+1000_rBaH_X1/r62uLNH.--