From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: bkl-removal/arm merge conflict Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 15:21:57 +1000 Message-ID: <20080522152157.57dac9f7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__22_May_2008_15_21_57_+1000_3DRz3Q+HMieukII5" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:40749 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753218AbYEVFWI (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 01:22:08 -0400 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Russell King --Signature=_Thu__22_May_2008_15_21_57_+1000_3DRz3Q+HMieukII5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jon, Today's linux-next merge of the bkl-removal tree got a conflict in arch/arm/common/rtctime.c between commit b204d462d7eae31413c5ac80ec3a32a89765fd46 ("[RTC] remove old ARM rtc library code") from the arm tree and commit f6f28a87d5f4ae2b101e64ab494267f6858631c4 ("arm-common-rtctime: BKL pushdown") from the bkl-removal tree. The former removed the file which is what I did in linux-next. Jon, you may want to remove or revert that commit from your tree. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__22_May_2008_15_21_57_+1000_3DRz3Q+HMieukII5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFINQL6TgG2atn1QN8RAjF7AJ9Zly89gClY6yK97ASpU1ErUiqwTACfdSya xuq/OozfnujLwtM+2YAdhuM= =nUXH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__22_May_2008_15_21_57_+1000_3DRz3Q+HMieukII5--