From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: driver-core/i2c merge conflicts Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 23:05:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20080526060546.GA14578@kroah.com> References: <20080526121820.03d27324.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:58362 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917AbYEZGPe (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 02:15:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080526121820.03d27324.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:18:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, Jean, > > Today's linux-next merge of the i2c tree got conflicts in > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c between "i2c-use-class_for_each_device" from the > driver-core tree" and "i2c: Use class_for_each_device", "i2c: Use > list_for_each_entry_safe" and "i2c: Simplify i2c_del_driver()" from the > i2c tree. > > I used the version from the i2c tree except I added NULL for the new > parameter to class_for_each_device. This merge fixup has replaced the > build fixup in the previous linux-next tree. Thanks, the fixup is fine, I ended up duplicating the same work in the i2c tree accidentally for a different reason, as it is needed for some class rework in the driver core tree. thanks, greg k-h