From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:46:18 +1000 Message-ID: <20080701004618.57dec8f1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20080630232248.8d993f1d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080630140644.GA5167@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__1_Jul_2008_00_46_18_+1000_fkUn7u7pYeWbH4FG" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:41187 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842AbYF3OqW (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:46:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080630140644.GA5167@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Sam Ravnborg , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" --Signature=_Tue__1_Jul_2008_00_46_18_+1000_fkUn7u7pYeWbH4FG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ingo, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:06:44 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > hm, there's no known (or even any recently fixed) kbuild related problem= =20 > in the stuff that comes towards linux-next from -tip. I've done an=20 > integration run earlier today - have you already picked that up? No, I collected all the trees at about 9:30 am my time i.e. about 15 hours ago. However, there have been several changes in this area in the kbuild tree over the past few days ... --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__1_Jul_2008_00_46_18_+1000_fkUn7u7pYeWbH4FG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkho8boACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wfPwCgnJXnSnTTj7UmfVjuKyTbvRWX +EQAn2mWSveNTHLV8+4BJjk2Vpg+aCpG =Fq2i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__1_Jul_2008_00_46_18_+1000_fkUn7u7pYeWbH4FG--