From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:35:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20080704093516.6d9a8195@hyperion.delvare> References: <20080703133905.7b6f058f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080703054739.GA643@secretlab.ca> <9e4733910807030522h1aa0bl1801ecc5fc877c25@mail.gmail.com> <20080703152453.GB2284@secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from zone0.gcu-squad.org ([212.85.147.21]:2711 "EHLO services.gcu-squad.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754351AbYGDHgM (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 03:36:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Grant Likely Cc: Jon Smirl , Stephen Rothwell , galak@kernel.crashing.org, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:54:26 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:22:18AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > >> Testing was good when the patch was initially posted in January. In > >> the last six months the initial patch set has been sliced and diced > >> into a bunch of different pieces but the contents of this patch are > >> essentially unchanged. > >> > >> I don't care which tree it uses to get to mainline, I'd just like to > >> see it get merged. > > > > Me too, but it is used by some of the mpc8xxx platforms too, so I'd like > > to see an ack from one of those users also. > > Okay, I've tested it on my board. All looks good to me. I'd prefer > to hear back from one of the Freescale folks, but on a second reading > I think it is pretty safe. I'll make sure any merge conflicts are > resolved. > > Jean, is it okay with you to drop it from your tree and merge it through mine? Sure, no problem. It's done now, the patch is yours. -- Jean Delvare